Israel

Fred's Myth

Nonhyphenated American
So you admit it is meaningless
  • "It's hard to win an argument with a smart person, but it's damn near impossible to win an argument with a stupid person." - Bill Murray.
“And it doesn’t make you look superior, it make you look to be the idiot’s equal.”-Fred’s Myth
 

oldngray

nowhere special
  • "It's hard to win an argument with a smart person, but it's damn near impossible to win an argument with a stupid person." - Bill Murray.
“And it doesn’t make you look superior, it make you look to be the idiot’s equal.”-Fred’s Myth
That sounds like something Will Rogers would have said.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
All the countries that have nukes mustve been over 90%
You having a problem with comprehension? Name one country ENRICHING URANIUM FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF NUCLEAR POWER THAT'S ENRICHING TO 60% OR MORE?

And enriching uranium is a long, drawn out process. Why would the countries who have nuclear weapons that need 90% enrichment use that highly enriched uranium when all they need for their nuclear power is 3.5%? They would save the highly enriched uranium for their bombs.
 

UnionStrong

Sorry, but I don’t care anymore.
  • "It's hard to win an argument with a smart person, but it's damn near impossible to win an argument with a stupid person." - Bill Murray.
“And it doesn’t make you look superior, it make you look to be the idiot’s equal.”-Fred’s Myth
Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.
Mark Twain
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
You wouldnt know anyways

You think tje bombings were a success
The truth is none of us know for sure what the bombings did or did didn’t do to the nuclear capabilities of Iran


But the bombings were absolutely successful and stopping the most important thing….., the war and killing between Iran and Israel. It was an amazing success and turnaround within 24 hours.
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
You having a problem with comprehension? Name one country ENRICHING URANIUM FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF NUCLEAR POWER THAT'S ENRICHING TO 60% OR MORE?

And enriching uranium is a long, drawn out process. Why would the countries who have nuclear weapons that need 90% enrichment use that highly enriched uranium when all they need for their nuclear power is 3.5%? They would save the highly enriched uranium for their bombs.
Youre saying usa never enriched to 90% to get its nukes lol?
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
You having a problem with comprehension? Name one country ENRICHING URANIUM FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF NUCLEAR POWER THAT'S ENRICHING TO 60% OR MORE?

And enriching uranium is a long, drawn out process. Why would the countries who have nuclear weapons that need 90% enrichment use that highly enriched uranium when all they need for their nuclear power is 3.5%? They would save the highly enriched uranium for their bombs.
Correct in order for Iran to even be up to 60% that means they were violating the agreement they signed with Obama that everyone like @rickyb is screaming about Trump ripping up, which actually he should have because they were in no way following their agreement even back then.
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
The truth is none of us know for sure what the bombings did or did didn’t do to the nuclear capabilities of Iran


But the bombings were absolutely successful and stopping the most important thing….., the war and killing between Iran and Israel. It was an amazing success and turnaround within 24 hours.
I agree with the first line

Dont know about the second
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
Correct in order for Iran to even be up to 60% that means they were violating the agreement they assigned with Obama that everyone like @rickyb is screaming about Trump ripping up, which actually he should have because they were in the way following their agreement.
Trump ripped it up at which point the number went to 60
 
Top