J6 Hearing

PT Car Washer

Well-Known Member
Well that's weird. Could have sworn the Mueller investigation showed there was no Russian collusion. And that was run by a bunch of Hillary supporting Dems.
Never said collusion. I said interferance in favor of trump. Of course we will never know what Putin and trump discussed in their private meetings.
 

upschuck

Well-Known Member
Even a grand jury doesn't allow hearsay evidence.

9-11.232 - USE OF HEARSAY IN A GRAND JURY PROCEEDING

As a general rule, it is proper to present hearsay to the grand jury, United States v. Calandra 414 U.S. 338 (1974). Each United States Attorney should be assured that hearsay evidence presented to the grand jury will be presented on its merits so that the jurors are not misled into believing that the witness is giving his or her personal account. See United States v. Leibowitz, 420 friend.2d 39 (2d Cir. 1969); but see United States v. Trass, 644 friend.2d 791 (9th Cir. 1981).

9-11.000 - Grand Jury).

This says different.
 

oldngray

nowhere special


This says different.
Each United States Attorney should be assured that hearsay evidence presented to the grand jury will be presented on its merits so that the jurors are not misled into believing that the witness is giving his or her personal account.
 

upschuck

Well-Known Member
Each United States Attorney should be assured that hearsay evidence presented to the grand jury will be presented on its merits so that the jurors are not misled into believing that the witness is giving his or her personal account.
And it was. Everyone knew it was hearsay, and not first hand knowledge.
 

oldngray

nowhere special
And it was. Everyone knew it was hearsay, and not first hand knowledge.
Yet the J6 never said it was hearsay. It was just obvious to anyone with a functional brain. Which leaves out the media trying to hype the nothingburgers.

Schiff just said he will be presenting new evidence just before the midterm elections. I'm still waiting for all the other proof he claimed he had.
 

zubenelgenubi

I'm a star
We have to go over this again? Congress only has the power to conduct hearings as a way to inform legislation. There is no pending legislation related to this matter, the hearing is a sham. It's a show to fill the empty void between the ears of every government worshipper out there. Hope this helps.
 

upschuck

Well-Known Member
Everyone also knew the whole thing is a sham. But the J6 still tries to pretend otherwise.

Schiff just said he will be presenting new evidence just before the midterm elections. I'm still waiting for all the other proof he claimed he had.
So, since you aren't rebutting, you agree that hearsay is allowed?
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
Never said collusion. I said interferance in favor of trump. Of course we will never know what Putin and trump discussed in their private meetings.
That’s actually quite far from the conspiracy theory of Russia gate. You believe the conspiracy that a president of the United States was being blackmailed sexually by Russia. And that the levers of power were being controlled by Russia because of it. You are basically I left wing Alex Jones. Interference in elections has been going on since the beginning of time by all countries so please stop with your nonsense.



 

Susie Driver

Founding Member
Everybody knows by now that the Clinton campaign paid for disinformation in the form of the now infamous Steele Dossier and pushed the narrative of Trump colluding with the Russians. Never proven, totally fabricated. But hey, keep putting it out there. You certainly can't point to Biden administration accomplishments to justify keeping Democrats in power Sportello. Must be frustrating to claim Trump was a terrible president and to have replaced him with the worst president in history.
Joe Biden saved my pension.

I will let historians judge who was better, not a broke ass ex-pat.
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
Last edited:

Susie Driver

Founding Member

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
If it last 30 years both my wife and I will be over 100 years old.

IDGAF about you.
Typical for you I’m sure. But your ignorance only proves my point. I get to go to a meetings yearly with the actuaries and the trustees of the pension plan. This money can only last in two ways

1.their ability to continue to invest. (Which they have failed at every turn)

2. The rate at which the retirees are passing away which is increasing.

Sounds great doesn’t it.

And now we find out The current solution allows plans to invest a portion of their financial-assistance funds in higher-return assets.

Which if you look at their past performance should mean this money will last about 3 to 5 years before we start talking about going broke again.

That’s nice you don’t care about me but I can assure you in the position I hold we were promised the pension would be fixed, and I did my part because I care, and I only have nine years in Central states. The pension is not fixed it is only the can be kicked down the road and we don’t even know how far down the road for sure.

I will certainly give credit where credit is due they did something but it was not completely what was promised which is typical for politicians.
 
Last edited:

Susie Driver

Founding Member
Typical for you I’m sure. But your ignorance only proves my point. I get to go to a meetings yearly with the actuaries and the trustees of the pension plan. This money can only last in two ways

1.their ability to continue to invest. (Which they have failed at every turn)

2. The rate at which the retirees are passing away which is increasing.

Sounds great doesn’t it.

And now we find out The current solution allows plans to invest a portion of their financial-assistance funds in higher-return assets.

Which if you look at their past performance should mean this money will last about 3 to 5 years before we start talking about going broke again.

That’s nice you don’t care about me but I can assure you in the position I hold we were promised the pension would be fixed, and I did my part because I care and I only have nine years in Central states. The pension is not fixed it is only the can be kicked down the road and we don’t even know how far down the road for sure.

I will certainly give credit where credit is due they did something but it was not completely what was promised which is typical for politicians.
Wouldn’t you be covered by the UPS pension, then?
 
Top