J6 Hearing

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
What recession is that?


habits/








Yep you’re right we’re just fine
 

bottomups

Bad Moon Risen'


habits/








Yep you’re right we’re just fine
Where did I state we were fine. Not currently in recession. Inflation decreases during recession.
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
I understand there were points there were pitched battles and others where the police let people in.

The problem is you guys think those spots that let people through justifies all the actions and excuses the violence.
anyone that walked through an open door without resisting police efforts to stop them should not have been charged.
those who committed acts of violence should have been charged.

those words above can also apply to the inner city riots in this country of which there were many more and much more destructive. I might have missed it but i dont see you posting pictures of those acts of violence and complaining that more was not done to punish the rioters?

I don't see any efforts by your side to charge the folks protesting at the homes of our supreme court justices in a clear effort to intimidate their decision? By your sides definition that effort to intimidate said judges would be insurrection also.

is your outrage politically selective?
 

newolddude

Well-Known Member
anyone that walked through an open door without resisting police efforts to stop them should not have been charged.
those who committed acts of violence should have been charged.

those words above can also apply to the inner city riots in this country of which there were many more and much more destructive. I might have missed it but i dont see you posting pictures of those acts of violence and complaining that more was not done to punish the rioters?

I don't see any efforts by your side to charge the folks protesting at the homes of our supreme court justices in a clear effort to intimidate their decision? By your sides definition that effort to intimidate said judges would be insurrection also.

is your outrage politically selective?
Anyone that protests at a Supreme Court justice's house should be charged and thrown in jail. I might not like what the justices do but they must be able to make their rulings without intimidation.

I know you'd like the people protesting SC justices put up against the wall and executed without trial so that's our difference.
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
Anyone that protests at a Supreme Court justice's house should be charged and thrown in jail. I might not like what the justices do but they must be able to make their rulings without intimidation.

I know you'd like the people protesting SC justices put up against the wall and executed without trial so that's our difference.
Protesting Supreme Court Justice‘s house is perfectly legal as long as they do not Get violent
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
Anyone that protests at a Supreme Court justice's house should be charged and thrown in jail. I might not like what the justices do but they must be able to make their rulings without intimidation.

I know you'd like the people protesting SC justices put up against the wall and executed without trial so that's our difference.
that was silly. The folks who entered the capital and did nothing else but protest were arrested , denied their constitutionally mandated rights and held in jail endlessly. most are accused of insurrection but have not been charged with such. Those who did nothing other than tresspassing should have been charged accordingly and released immediately. the police allowing them entry should completely negate charges of tresspassing unless they forced entry some other way.
Others who engaged in destruction should have been charged accordingly and released as the law allows. Instead many were held as political prisoners and denied their rights.

the protestors outside the judges houses are by the dems definition also insurrectionists trying to intimidate and disrupt a decision. they should have been either charged as the law allows and released or kept at a safe distance away. I think the charge of insurrection thrown out for any of this is silly but once you throw it out there for one act where the government was disrupted then you have to equally apply it to all acts that disrupt our government.

the examples above are clear examples of politically motivated examples of how our laws are being enforced, not enforced and misinterpreted.

its not about as your hysterical response states putting someone up against a wall but holding that the laws are applied fairly.
your sides riots in the streets were supposedly about demanding equal treatment under the law yet here we see clear examples that the same side that ran those protest for equal treatement have no problem denying equal treatment to those on the opposite side of the political fence.

at some point we all have to be outraged at all abuses of the law and not do so selectively depending on our political will.
 
Last edited:

newolddude

Well-Known Member
Protesting Supreme Court Justice‘s house is perfectly legal as long as they do not Get violent
No, they shouldn't be anywhere near their private homes. Justices should also get to go to overpriced upscale chain steak places for dinner in peace.

People should be able to protest in front of the Supreme Court building in the street.
 
Top