Kamala Harris Wins VP Sweepstakes ... Will She Deliver?

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
He was arguing for the State of Nevada’s sovereignty. Not declaring his own sovereign territory.
He was claiming state’s sovereignty for himself. He was claiming something for himself that belonged to the state that the state was not arguing for.
 

Box Ox

Well-Known Member
He was claiming state’s sovereignty for himself. He was claiming something for himself that belonged to the state that the state was not arguing for.

Sure. Republicans push for that all the time when it’s in their interest. He wasn’t setting up an autonomous zone.
 

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
Sure. Republicans push for that all the time when it’s in their interest. He wasn’t setting up an autonomous zone.
He was claiming that he was subject only to the laws of Nevada not those of the United States. The state of Nevada didn’t seem to agree.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
He was claiming that he was subject only to the laws of Nevada not those of the United States. The state of Nevada didn’t seem to agree.
Well that's certainly comparable to all the looting, rioting, and burning that's been going on. Hell, it's worse, much much worse!!
 

Old Man Jingles

Rat out of a cage
He was claiming that he was subject only to the laws of Nevada not those of the United States. The state of Nevada didn’t seem to agree.
Well that's certainly comparable to all the looting, rioting, and burning that's been going on. Hell, it's worse, much much worse!!
You have to understand that subservience to a Socialist Autocratic Central Government
is core to the belief systems of these pathetic LibTurds on here!

There is nothing they detest more than individual rights ... they hate freedom!
Just like China.
 

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
You have to understand that subservience to a Socialist Autocratic Central Government
is core to the belief systems of these pathetic LibTurds on here!

There is nothing they detest more than individual rights ... they hate freedom!
Just like China.
I simply find the “rights” people claim to have pretty funny. I mean Bundy was trying to claim that as a citizen of the sovereign state of Nevada he wasn’t subject to the laws of the United States. Now if Nevada disagrees with that assertion, Bundy would be placing his own interpretation of his individual rights above that which he has declared sovereign. He has in fact placed himself as sovereign over the state of Nevada and the United States, literally the definition of sovereign citizen. But he didn’t call himself that so it doesn’t count. And Ted Bundy never called himself a male rapist.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
I simply find the “rights” people claim to have pretty funny. I mean Bundy was trying to claim that as a citizen of the sovereign state of Nevada he wasn’t subject to the laws of the United States. Now if Nevada disagrees with that assertion, Bundy would be placing his own interpretation of his individual rights above that which he has declared sovereign. He has in fact placed himself as sovereign over the state of Nevada and the United States, literally the definition of sovereign citizen. But he didn’t call himself that so it doesn’t count. And Ted Bundy never called himself a male rapist.
Sure, equate him with a serial killer.
 

Fred's Myth

Nonhyphenated American
I simply find the “rights” people claim to have pretty funny. I mean Bundy was trying to claim that as a citizen of the sovereign state of Nevada he wasn’t subject to the laws of the United States. Now if Nevada disagrees with that assertion, Bundy would be placing his own interpretation of his individual rights above that which he has declared sovereign. He has in fact placed himself as sovereign over the state of Nevada and the United States, literally the definition of sovereign citizen. But he didn’t call himself that so it doesn’t count. And Ted Bundy never called himself a male rapist.
You talking about Ted, or Al?
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
Which brings up a good point ... the citizens of the USA will be electing the next two Presidents if they vote for the Biden/Harris ticket.
While Wilson's wife could preside as President a hundred years ago,
Jill will not be allowed to be the de facto President of the USA in today's world.
Kamala will either run him out with a sexual assault charge or take him out when he goes completely bonkers
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
It’s not a matter of semantics at all. Bundy claimed that the state had sovereignty in the matter and resisted on those grounds but didn’t declare his own sovereign territory as the hard leftists have been doing. There is a difference.

Was Bundy an idiot, and wrong? Absolutely.

If you lose you're wrong even when you're right.
 
Top