Kerry
- Thread starter moreluck
- Start date
bottomups
Bad Moon Risen'
Is that your teleprompter your reading from? If it is, then I agree your an idiot. Next question please.
BrownArmy
Well-Known Member
In fact, Iran isn't keeping their centrifuges, and they're not anywhere close to making a bomb.
With this deal, they're even farther away from a bomb.
We're going to kill them with capitalism.
I would have thought the 'right' would be happy with this plan - we're going to flood their country with $$$.
They'll be able to buy Levi's upfront now, instead of on the down-low.
It's the same deal with Cuba - we'll destroy them with capitalism.
What's not to love?
With this deal, they're even farther away from a bomb.
We're going to kill them with capitalism.
I would have thought the 'right' would be happy with this plan - we're going to flood their country with $$$.
They'll be able to buy Levi's upfront now, instead of on the down-low.
It's the same deal with Cuba - we'll destroy them with capitalism.
What's not to love?
ImWaitingForTheDay
Annoy a conservative....Think for yourself
Actually Iran is keeping a large number of centrifuges - http://www.bloombergview.com/quicktake/irans-uranium-enrichment - The Democrat cheerleaders can see no wrong with this deal when it is full of loopholes.
BrownArmy
Well-Known Member
Pray tell, what's the other option?
That there is only a choice between this agreement and war is a blatant fallacy. Back out, allow sanctions to rebuild pressure, don't appear willing to give away everything just to get a deal and come up with an agreement that actually has at least a few enforceable mechanisms. The sanctions drove Iran to the table and we could have actually gotten a good agreement.
bottomups
Bad Moon Risen'
Have you read this agreement?
This important sentence was in the link you provided...
"No deal, supporters say, would have left Iran free to make a bomb — or lead to a war aimed at keeping that from happening."
TOS.
Babagounj
Strength through joy
getting a paper cut is not being wounded .
Served under an old policy that said 3 wounds and you get to go home and throw someone else'
s medals over the WH fence .
His plan was to be the next JFK , a war hero but the liberal cause of peace in 'Nam stopped him dead in his tracks .
If you like him so much that go out for drinks with him , just remember to bring a fat wallet with you because he handles nickles like sewer covers .
That which has been made public, yes. I have not heard the summary Jon Stewart put out after his latest visit to the white house, which seems to be the foundation for a large number of people.
At risk of violating the TOS, I have to ask if you understand logic? Do you really think a statement by one side of an argument that does not present any supporting information or counter arguments is really relevant. Is that what Jon Stewart tells you to think?
moreluck
golden ticket member
"During Senate hearings, Secretary of State John Kerry was told he had been "fleeced" and "bamboozled" by the Iranians on the nuclear deal. Kerry disagreed, pointing out that he has an entire handful of magic beans to show for it."
"A new poll shows that liberals are more likely to drink than conservatives. Which may explain the Iran deal. "
~Fred Thompson~
"A new poll shows that liberals are more likely to drink than conservatives. Which may explain the Iran deal. "
~Fred Thompson~
wkmac
Well-Known Member
Politicians always prove they are not that bright when they open their mouths, even the one's with a Yale education.
Similar threads
