LGBTQ

Fred's Myth

Fred's Myth

Nonhyphenated American
trickpony1 said:
Maybe you and DIDO could have a date night?
Click to expand...
Found a pic of DIDO waiting for a date.
GettyImages-1131874688.jpg
 
DriveInDriѵeOut

DriveInDriѵeOut

Inordinately Right
R

refineryworker05

Well-Known Member
moreluck said:
What happens if your kid refuses to go through a "rainbow doctor's" door ???



I could care less if someone is gay, but all this pandering to a tiny fraction of the population (less than 2%) is mind-numbing.

Via Washington Times:
In its first sexual-orientation policy update in nearly a decade, the nation’s largest pediatricians group said its members should do more to fight “heterosexism” and “homophobia,” as well as step up their care of teens with same-sex attractions.

“Sexual-minority youth should not be considered abnormal,” the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) said in its new materials on lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and questioning (LGBTQ) youths, released Monday.

The policy statement and technical report — which updates a 2004 policy — is nonbinding but recommends that pediatricians create offices that are “teen-friendly and welcoming to all adolescents, regardless of sexual orientation and behavior.”

Doctors can signal their openness to LGBTQ youths by putting out brochures with pictures of “both same- and opposite-gender couples” or posting a “rainbow” decal on an office door or bulletin board. The report also suggests that medical questionnaires be changed to be gender-neutral, and that staff be trained to not ask a boy about his girlfriend, but to ask him to “tell me about your partner” instead.
​
Click to expand...

I don't really care about homosexual issues, there are a lot of issues I don't really have much thought about, but what I always attempt to do with issues I don't have much care for is see what's at hand.

On the one hand, for homosexuals, they have without question faced and continue to face violence and discrimination because they are homosexual and were for a very long time defined as abnormal in general within this society, and as abominations in religious text.

So coming from that perspective, it's easy to see where this political energy is coming from in defense of their place within society.

The opposition or the people who are against this stuff for the most part at first projected this idea that recognizing homosexuals and not demonizing them as deviants would be disastrous for society, now these same people are projecting this idea that they'll be victimized or are going to be punished as a result of the political energy surrounding homosexual acceptance within society either based on their religious beliefs or just their right to have a differing belief about homosexuals.

In other words, imo the opposition is making stuff up in order to maintain a situation of oppression against homosexuals to some degree or another.

To me that's the major thrust of this homosexual rights stuff, are all homosexual's perfect? No are all there political ideas great? No, do I have any idea what CIS gendered, non binary, hetero normative mean? No, do I care about that stuff? No. I am comfortable seeing transgendered people? not really, but should my personal feelings about these people impact their access to protection under the law they in many cases are denied? Heck no.

I can see reality.
 
Last edited:
moreluck

moreluck

golden ticket member
refineryworker05 said:
I don't really care about homosexual issues, there are a lot of issues I don't really have much thought about, but what I always attempt to do with issues I don't have much care for is see what's at hand.

On the one hand, for homosexuals, they have without question faced and continue to face violence and discrimination because they are homosexual and were for a very long time defined as abnormal in general within this society, and as abominations in religious text.

So coming from that perspective, it's easy to see where this political energy is coming from in defense of their place within society.

The opposition or the people who are against this stuff for the most part at first projected this idea that recognizing homosexuals and not demonizing them as deviants would be disastrous for society, now these same people are projecting this idea that they'll be victimized or are going to be punished as a result of the political energy surrounding homosexual acceptance within society either based on their religious beliefs or just their right to have a differing belief about homosexuals.

In other words, imo the opposition is making stuff up in order to maintain a situation of oppression against homosexuals to some degree or another.

To me that's the major thrust of this homosexual rights stuff, are all homosexual's perfect? No are all there political ideas great? No, do I have any idea what CIS gendered, non binary, hetero normative mean? No, do I care about that stuff? No. I am comfortable seeing transgendered people? not really, but should my personal feelings about these people impact their access to protection under the law they in many cases are denied? Heck no.

I can see reality.
Click to expand...
Then you know about the high roof and "falling" problems in other countries.?
 
R

refineryworker05

Well-Known Member
moreluck said:
All the radical Muslims push homosexuals off of high roof places because they claim there are no gays in their country!! They deny the existence of gays, so they kill them.....kinda like dwarf-tossing only deadlier!
Click to expand...


Huh, what is what you posted in anyway at all related to my post? I posted a specific thing about the homosexual rights/acceptance thing in US and the opposition to that, and you come with gibberish that has nothing to do with anything I posted.
 
Top