Media Bias

floridays

Well-Known Member
I remember when everyone was so positive that OJ had murdered those people. Turns out he didn't. What a bunch of idiots right?
Actually no comparison, the DA actually had evidence of a crime and a plausible reason to name OJ as a criminal defendant.
You understand this, you just dealt another worthless, baseless post, it's your style.
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
when reading american media talk about forgien govts which are allies or enemies of the US govt, watch to see how much the medias take follows the US govts line.

if its close to 1:1, then they are doing propaganda. if they are using different standards for allies and enemies, then its propaganda.
 

MrFedEx

Engorged Member
The civil suit found enough evidence to say he did.

BIGLY innocent. OJ didn't intend to murder them. He wanted Al Cowlings to do it, and then Al changed his mind. No murder!! He didn't intend to kill them, he intended AC to do it. Game Over!!

You know. A lot like "firing" Mueller.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
BIGLY innocent. OJ didn't intend to murder them. He wanted Al Cowlings to do it, and then Al changed his mind. No murder!! He didn't intend to kill them, he intended AC to do it. Game Over!!

You know. A lot like "firing" Mueller.
In OJ's case two people were murdered. What crime did Trump actually commit? You can talk intent all day, but was Mueller obstructed? Was Mueller or any of his team fired? Were documents denied to Mueller? Were witnesses prevented from testifying? Was executive privilege exercised? Comey was fired? You can't charge a president with obstruction for carrying out constitutionally granted power. And Comey wasn't a part of Mueller's investigative team.
 
Top