Now this type of logical argument from you does not surprise me ... it is par for the course for you.
This is an example of an Ad Hominem Fallacy in my logic ... it does not address your points.
Your statement of "Your argument is that it doesn't matter whether protesters broke his door, the mere fact that they were protesting is wrong." is an example of of a Straw Man Fallacy because your point, "... the mere fact that they were protesting is wrong." is a point that has not been discussed with me and furthermore, it is a position that I obviously do not hold.
Your statement, "You are unamerican. Shame on you" is based on your straw man fallacy.
Additionally, this type of argument is an example of a False Dichotomy Fallacy because your reasoning fails by limiting the options to two when there are in fact more options to choose from. Additionally, your conclusion is an example of a Slippery Slope Fallacy argument based on your illogical Straw Man Fallacy covered above.