I didn't say it was him. I said it wouldn't surprise me. Didn't make anything up.
Nancy Pelosi's husband attacked in family home
- Thread starter 728ups
- Start date
newolddude
Well-Known Member
What do you mean? What was handled differently? He was arrested after the accident, charged, released and went through what sounds like a standard process.
Paul Pelosi gets 5 days in jail, 3 years of probation in DUI
The husband of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi pleaded guilty to misdemeanor driving under the influence charges related to a May crash in California's wine country.
www.politico.com
newolddude
Well-Known Member
I've searched a couple of different ways/terms and I don't see anything about anyone else being in the Porsche with Paul Pelosi.
Paul Pelosi DUI dashcam video released after California guilty plea
California police video shows Paul Pelosi, the husband of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, after a May drunken driving crash in which he totaled his Porsche.
Police Bodycam Video Of Paul Pelosi Attack
Police body camera video shows David DePape attacking Paul Pelosi
rumble.com
The better question in this video is, who opened the door???
See if the cops video is out there for that arrest. They only should you the part where pelosi was out of the car. Not the initial walk up..I've searched a couple of different ways/terms and I don't see anything about anyone else being in the Porsche with Paul Pelosi.
Paul Pelosi DUI dashcam video released after California guilty plea
California police video shows Paul Pelosi, the husband of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, after a May drunken driving crash in which he totaled his Porsche.www.foxnews.com
Hmm, thought that was covered extensively here.I've searched a couple of different ways/terms and I don't see anything about anyone else being in the Porsche with Paul Pelosi.
Paul Pelosi DUI dashcam video released after California guilty plea
California police video shows Paul Pelosi, the husband of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, after a May drunken driving crash in which he totaled his Porsche.
newolddude
Well-Known Member
I did a search here and found nothing about Pelosi having a mystery passenger.
728ups
All Trash No Trailer
doesen't matter, a mystery passenger fuels the conspiracy obession
BigUnionGuy
Got the T-Shirt
Babagounj
Strength through joy
You're struggling with an attacker and still holding on to your drink in the other hand ?
Fred's Myth
Nonhyphenated American
Expensive liquor, of course.
728ups
All Trash No Trailer
728ups
All Trash No Trailer
BrownFlush
Woke Racist Reigning Ban King
Don't forget the freezer full of ice cream Nancy has. Maybe that was what he was after.
What I heard on the 911 call was a scared man who had to be very careful what he said with his assailant standing close by. Was trying to get across the danger without getting attacked. The video of that guy breaking in didn't show a guy who was invited in. And on the police body cam it showed a man reaching out to keep a hand on the assailant's weapon because he feared it was going to be used on him.
I get that many people strongly disliked Nancy Pelosi. But we shouldn't rush to judgement on these things before all the facts are known and smear someone just because we don't like their spouse. Right up there with accusations that some actually believe that Michelle Obama is a man. Or that Hillary Clinton was running a child sex ring above a pizza parlor in Philadelphia or other ridiculous claims.
At the same time when there are known facts that surface, like tell all laptops or Big Tech working behind the scenes to silence and marginalize conservatives, liberals shouldn't be disingenuous about what is glaringly true. As if denying it enough will make it go away. A better country won't result from one side completely getting its way on everything without reaching reasonable compromises with opposition voices. And working behind the scenes to make sure one side gets its way only fuels conspiracy theories, resentment, fear and loathing and as in Jan.6th backlash. Is that truly the world we want?
It's the audio of Pelosi's 911 call that cleared things up for me. Pelosi was trying to drop hints to the dispatcher so Depape wouldn't get angry and the dispatcher just wasn't figuring things out. So it makes sense that the officers that responded didn't dive right in to stop Depape the moment they arrived.
The San Francisco PD is likely pretty incompetent in general due to their political environment and who they report to.
Seems like a botched police response led to selective leaking at first that made it sound like Pelosi was more at fault than he actually was. And it's understandable that the drip of sometimes contradictory information led people (myself included) to come up with their own theories about what had happened to fill the void.
El Correcto
god is dead
Not really. It just takes a lil common sense.
Similar threads
