HomeDelivery
Well-Known Member
i don't count my load/sort times when i pre-load my package car... if i did, i'll be at/over my 14 hour limit for a few routes that i cover, so OP is correct that it does happen
i don't count my load/sort times when i pre-load my package car... if i did, i'll be at/over my 14 hour limit for a few routes that i cover, so OP is correct that it does happen
Thank you for vindicating my experience, HD. What they wanted us to do was a bit worse. Here's how much work time had lapsed before we even logged in:
1) We keep our vehicles at home and drive about 90 minutes to the terminal in the AM: 1.5 hours
2) Pack our town trucks as the package handler unloads the Ground trailer: 1 hour (or more)
3) Print out manifests, grab call tags, listen to the terminal manager
rattle on about some incident that happened 400 miles away, gas up, etc. 30 minutes
4) Drive 90 minutes back to the edge of our routes 1.5 hours
5) Call CPC for a remote login password, log in, organize stops on manifest 15 minutes
On average, we cheated the scanner/DOT times by an average of 4 hours, 45 minutes every single day. I do consider this an extreme case because we are so small and remote. If we logged in at 5am when we leave home, I think it's a real possibility we would violate DOT timeframes much more than the allowed 6 times per year.
By logging in remotely, it gives whoever views this information the illusion that we are somehow loading here and not driving 170 miles round trip everyday. Not only that, but once a week we'd take turns running all the outbound packages back to the terminal, so it was a double drive of 340 miles + route milage of about 40, resulting in 380 miles of driving, even on a light day. On these days we'd log in remotely, then log out before we made the trip to the terminal. Very shady.
Or just DNA the packages and tell the contractor it's their problem for sending you out with more than you can handle...
Really, Nick. Your SM is a pen-pushing-near-no ody. You really need to contact contractor relations and start rattling the saber. They will take it seriously because the things you describe are the things that make lawsuits. They aren't going to protect a SM and bis henchmen. Takes more guts than posting your angst here, uy may be with it.
Really, Nick. Your SM is a pen-pushing-near-no ody. You really need to contact contractor relations and start rattling the saber. They will take it seriously because the things you describe are the things that make lawsuits. They aren't going to protect a SM and bis henchmen. Takes more guts than posting your angst here, uy may be with it.
As you wish.
Really, Nick. Your SM is a pen-pushing-near-no ody. You really need to contact contractor relations and start rattling the saber. They will take it seriously because the things you describe are the things that make lawsuits. They aren't going to protect a SM and bis henchmen. Takes more guts than posting your angst here, uy may be with it.
What!? Contractor relations? they are equivalent to HR, appear to be on the 'side' of the employee but in reality be on the side of the company... I don't know who this specific contract relations person is but I will tell you that I won't take the bait if they do try to initiate contact with me first.
I believe he could. Would probably bring a surprise audit very quickly.can he report it anonymously?
Here is my response.
I am all for it and am confident that it would quickly run out alot of contractors and I would be more than happy to step in and take advantage of the situation.