I have heard for years about thus slippery slope. Where is it?Why is there need for a groundswell? According to the judges majority opinion doesn't matter in these cases.
I have heard for years about thus slippery slope. Where is it?Why is there need for a groundswell? According to the judges majority opinion doesn't matter in these cases.
Not saying its scary. maybe you're right bb..... just trying to point out that this decision wasn't just about gay marriage rights.... by changing the definition of marriage for one now has to be available to all in my opinion. Scary? Only time will tell but it opens up a whole new set of questions nowIs this somehow supposed to be scary? In all the states that have allowed gay marriage, has there been any kind of groundswell demand for polygamous marriages?
And so what if there is? Maybe the government's only move is to be out of marriage altogether.Not saying its scary. maybe you're right bb..... just trying to point out that this decision wasn't just about gay marriage rights.... by changing the definition of marriage for one now has to be available to all in my opinion. Scary? Only time will tell but it opens up a whole new set of questions now
In addition, while there may not be a groundswell of demand for polygamous marriages, Im sure there are some who would like to get married legally in the eyes of the law.Is this somehow supposed to be scary? In all the states that have allowed gay marriage, has there been any kind of groundswell demand for polygamous marriages?
Which one is to be called "the whiney little bitch?"What, pray tell, would those be?
THAT my friend I think is the best solution to satisfy everyone. But by the Courts decision Friday, Im fearful that may never happen ever nowAnd so what if there is? Maybe the government's only move is to be out of marriage altogether.
Inside of the left thigh.I have heard for years about thus slippery slope. Where is it?
does that lead to the money shot?Inside of the left thigh.
No, the money spot.does that lead to the money shot?
Maybe that's what the right wing should have been pushing for all these years.THAT my friend I think is the best solution to satisfy everyone. But by the Courts decision Friday, Im fearful that may never happen ever now
Maybe that's what all the politicians should have been pushing for.Maybe that's what the right wing should have been pushing for all these years.
Are you kidding?! That would have made for huge messes.Maybe that's what all the politicians should have been pushing for.
Are you kidding?! That would have made for huge messes.
Nope. Bear arms means bear arms. How and why was never supposed to be anyone's concern but the carrier.That right to bear arms can be interpreted as being allowed to have either open or concealed carry. States must allow at least one of those two choices.
It was just about gay marriage. If you read the justice's opinions they clearly laid out that fact. The media has done a poor job of actually laying out the facts of the justices' opinions. While I personally think polygamy should be legal, it's a non starter in regards to this ruling. If anything, the decision has made it even more clear than before that polygamous marriages aren't going to be legal.Not saying its scary. maybe you're right bb..... just trying to point out that this decision wasn't just about gay marriage rights.... by changing the definition of marriage for one now has to be available to all in my opinion. Scary? Only time will tell but it opens up a whole new set of questions now
The "husband" if they are to remain happily married.Which one is to be called "the whiney little bitch?"
Nope. Bear arms means bear arms. How and why was never supposed to be anyone's concern but the carrier.
Doesn't matter what the opinions was. It redefined marriage and opens up endless varieties of all marriage combinations. Muddles everythingIt was just about gay marriage. If you read the justice's opinions they clearly laid out that fact. The media has done a poor job of actually laying out the facts of the justices' opinions. While I personally think polygamy should be legal, it's a non starter in regards to this ruling. If anything, the decision has made it even more clear than before that polygamous marriages aren't going to be legal.
...and women were not supposed to vote.Nope. Bear arms means bear arms. How and why was never supposed to be anyone's concern but the carrier.
I feel bad for you.Doesn't matter what the opinions was. It redefined marriage and opens up endless varieties of all marriage combinations. Muddles everything