Only 5% of next car purchasers expect to buy all electric cars-Road and Track.

vantexan

Well-Known Member
i want us to live better than europe

your solutions dont work long distance. riding a gas scooter for 2 hours is madness and half as fast as high speed train. some of the other christians faith wasnt strong enough to already mention this; they chose the lies of silence instead.
No one is going to put in a train just for you. You can still ride the bus. You'll just have to start out earlier and get home later. If you aren't willing to make sacrifices to save the planet then why do you expect everyone else to?
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
No one is going to put in a train just for you. You can still ride the bus. You'll just have to start out earlier and get home later. If you aren't willing to make sacrifices to save the planet then why do you expect everyone else to?
why is no one going to put in a train for everyone?

if a scooter is 2 hours then a bus will be longer than that.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
why is no one going to put in a train for everyone?

if a scooter is 2 hours then a bus will be longer than that.
A train is at some point inconvenient unless you plan on putting in a line every mile or so. If no one has cars then the train has to be close enough to walk to or ride a bike to. Especially when weather is bad. One train line might be convenient for you if it's close enough but if it's say 5 miles away it doesn't do you any good. So you'd have to have train lines all over the place. That's not going to happen. You forget that North America is much, much larger than Europe but with a smaller population. You really haven't thought this through. And yet you'll ignore this and keep insisting. At some point I have to wonder if you were dropped on your head as a baby.
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
A train is at some point inconvenient unless you plan on putting in a line every mile or so. If no one has cars then the train has to be close enough to walk to or ride a bike to. Especially when weather is bad. One train line might be convenient for you if it's close enough but if it's say 5 miles away it doesn't do you any good. So you'd have to have train lines all over the place. That's not going to happen. You forget that North America is much, much larger than Europe but with a smaller population. You really haven't thought this through. And yet you'll ignore this and keep insisting. At some point I have to wonder if you were dropped on your head as a baby.
my gf is hot
im better at religion than most people
i dress better
i get more air on my snowboard
i drift my car
i drive public bus
i do extreme sports
so obviously im pretty good

now back to our conversation, initially said we should not expand our public transit system which would mean high speed trains in some places, but obviously some places are dense enough to have high speed.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
my gf is hot
im better at religion than most people
i dress better
i get more air on my snowboard
i drift my car
i drive public bus
i do extreme sports
so obviously im pretty good

now back to our conversation, initially said we should not expand our public transit system which would mean high speed trains in some places, but obviously some places are dense enough to have high speed.
You need high speed trains to replace your car according to you. Trains go from point A to point B. They don't go all over like cars do. To make trains replace cars you'll need a lot of them. Not feasible.
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
You need high speed trains to replace your car according to you. Trains go from point A to point B. They don't go all over like cars do. To make trains replace cars you'll need a lot of them. Not feasible.
you said we dont have to improve our transit system to european levels to get hte same benefits

and i showed you how your fastest recommendation of transit, a gas scooter, is not feasable.
 
Top