MAKAVELI
Well-Known Member
True, maybe these knuckleheads in Oregon should've tried that route, instead of the terrorist route.I never said it wasn't. But the color of green does a lot.
True, maybe these knuckleheads in Oregon should've tried that route, instead of the terrorist route.I never said it wasn't. But the color of green does a lot.
Can't answer that. Maybe they felt they didn't have another choice.True, maybe these knuckleheads in Oregon should've tried that route, instead of the terrorist route.
Truer words have never been spoken. I imagine that statement holds true for a wide range of people, especially people of color.Can't answer that. Maybe they felt they didn't have another choice.
Never know what someone's breaking point is.
Sometimes you feel like you have no other option. Something needs to break the cycle. If you feel you have nothing to lose ,why would you care?Truer words have never been spoken. I imagine that statement holds true for a wide range of people, especially people of color.
Not the black president that didn't help his brothers out?....oh wait. More food stamps. That solves it.This is all Bush's fault
At least he didn't discriminate against whites. He gave them more food stamps as well.Not the black president that didn't help his brothers out?....oh wait. More food stamps. That solves it.
Seriously think about it. He wants the black vote and the white folks money.At least he didn't discriminate against whites. He gave them more food stamps as well.
If it's white people's money, then they are now the slaves. Workin for the black man. Lol you are hilarious bro.Seriously think about it. He wants the black vote and the white folks money.
You finally get a so called black man in office and he just in slaves the black man more. What a joke.
You can't even have a real conversation. I try to tell you what I see and you spin it off.If it's white people's money, then they are now the slaves. Workin for the black man. Lol you are hilarious bro.
If that's what you see then you need your eyes checked.You can't even have a real conversation. I try to tell you what I see and you spin it off.
I see that nobody is willing to bite the bullet and address the real problems this country has.If that's what you see then you need your eyes checked.
Ironically, when the law was passed that mandated a minimum sentence, these same folks rejoiced. The law was passed to thwart 'eco-terrorism'. It looks like that law bit them in the butt.The men were convicted of arson, but under a provision of an expansive federal law punishing terrorism. They each served prison terms that the sentencing judge thought just, only to be told by appellate judges they had to go back to serve longer.
So a judge decided those fires were "terrorism" and said they need to serve 4 more years. Very likely to be something that would get overturned on appeal.
Yes, when a judge legislates from the bench, he/she should be removed. The judge had no right to impose a lesser sentence than the law mandated.Some of these judges need to be ripped off the bench and thrown in jail. The whole system is a joke.
Not sure how long ago it was. But do you remember some liberal judges (maybe Massachusetts) had convicted a child molester. Then she sentenced him to solitary confinement because he was small in stature and might be violated in prison?Ironically, when the law was passed that mandated a minimum sentence, these same folks rejoiced. The law was passed to thwart 'eco-terrorism'. It looks like that law bit them in the butt.
Yes, when a judge legislates from the bench, he/she should be removed. The judge had no right to impose a lesser sentence than the law mandated.
That's because this country's problems run so deep, they can't be fixed overnight. Probably not in our lifetime either.I see that nobody is willing to bite the bullet and address the real problems this country has.
Ironically, when the law was passed that mandated a minimum sentence, these same folks rejoiced. The law was passed to thwart 'eco-terrorism'. It looks like that law bit them in the butt.
Yes, when a judge legislates from the bench, he/she should be removed. The judge had no right to impose a lesser sentence than the law mandated.
Fat chicks in yoga pants?I see that nobody is willing to bite the bullet and address the real problems this country has.
We need to start somewhere. At least we can drink from the same water fountain.That's because this country's problems run so deep, they can't be fixed overnight. Probably not in our lifetime either.