President Trump

newfie

Well-Known Member
grammar nazi.gif
Not much “to” choose from

in my statement too is used to mean additionally
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
Steele has stated if anything he was 'favorably disposed' toward the Trump family before he began his research because he had visited a Trump family member at Trump Tower and 'been friendly' with that person for some years."

thats a bold faced lie by him. Its known that Steele was an avid hater of trump and his fabricated dossier of nonsense was more proof.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
Steele has stated if anything he was 'favorably disposed' toward the Trump family before he began his research because he had visited a Trump family member at Trump Tower and 'been friendly' with that person for some years."
He sure hated the head of the Trump family and that was widely known.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
And didn't lie about many more things!

Remind me again exactly which parts of the dossier were conclusively disproven!
The FBI did an internal investigation and said they couldn't corroborate about 90% of it. Under oath in England Steele admitted he got most of the info online plus one particular source. That source said that it was all bar talk, never meant to be taken seriously. You should be aware that the Steele dossier was the basis of getting warrants from the FISA court AFTER the FBI's number four guy in the FBI, Bruce Ohr, Steele's handler, told the high ups that the dossier couldn't be corroborated and that Steele had a strong political bias against Trump. By the way the House Intelligence Committee released over 50 transcripts last week of closed door hearings with major Democrats like James Clapper, Sally Yates, and Susan Rice where they all said they had not seen any evidence of colluding with Russians by the Trump administration. At the time of those interviews Adam Schiff was publicly saying numerous times that he had seen documents that proved Trump had colluded with Russians. After the Mueller report came out he couldn't produce any such documents and to date hasn't. The soft coup that was attempted is unraveling and looks like quite a few will be held accountable. Go ahead and put up the smiley faces and creative symbols. He who laughs last laughs loudest. What is really sad is I think some of you are ok with all of this because it's against Republicans. You'll certainly not want to see it done to a Democrat but if you don't support efforts to make everyone abide by the Constitution then that's what you'll get eventually.
 

oldngray

nowhere special
The FBI did an internal investigation and said they couldn't corroborate about 90% of it. Under oath in England Steele admitted he got most of the info online plus one particular source. That source said that it was all bar talk, never meant to be taken seriously. You should be aware that the Steele dossier was the basis of getting warrants from the FISA court AFTER the FBI's number four guy in the FBI, Bruce Ohr, Steele's handler, told the high ups that the dossier couldn't be corroborated and that Steele had a strong political bias against Trump. By the way the House Intelligence Committee released over 50 transcripts last week of closed door hearings with major Democrats like James Clapper, Sally Yates, and Susan Rice where they all said they had not seen any evidence of colluding with Russians by the Trump administration. At the time of those interviews Adam Schiff was publicly saying numerous times that he had seen documents that proved Trump had colluded with Russians. After the Mueller report came out he couldn't produce any such documents and to date hasn't. The soft coup that was attempted is unraveling and looks like quite a few will be held accountable. Go ahead and put up the smiley faces and creative symbols. He who laughs last laughs loudest. What is really sad is I think some of you are ok with all of this because it's against Republicans. You'll certainly not want to see it done to a Democrat but if you don't support efforts to make everyone abide by the Constitution then that's what you'll get eventually.

Steele "leaked" to Isikoff at Yahoo then used that story as a source to support his claims. Circular logic.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
So you've got nothing. By the way it turned out that Carter Page was a CIA asset. There's absolutely no evidence that he and Papadopoulos had any connection to Russians trying to throw the election but there's plenty of evidence that the FBI acted illegally in obtaining FISA warrants. The FBI's director, or in the last warrant the acting director, has to sign off on all evidence submitted to the court has been verified. Signing off on the Steele dossier that it was verified when they knew it wasn't is illegal.
 

fishtm2001

Well-Known Member
November 8, 2017: Robert Johnston, one of the cybersecurity experts who cleaned up the DNC hack stated that the June 2016 Washington Post story that identified the DNC hackers as Russians likely accelerated their timeline. After the story, Guccifer 2.0 and WikiLeaks began releasing information they claimed to have obtained from the hack. Johnston believes they would have held onto this information until the week or so preceding the election. [BuzzFeed News]
 

fishtm2001

Well-Known Member
The FBI did an internal investigation and said they couldn't corroborate about 90% of it. Under oath in England Steele admitted he got most of the info online plus one particular source. That source said that it was all bar talk, never meant to be taken seriously. You should be aware that the Steele dossier was the basis of getting warrants from the FISA court AFTER the FBI's number four guy in the FBI, Bruce Ohr, Steele's handler, told the high ups that the dossier couldn't be corroborated and that Steele had a strong political bias against Trump. By the way the House Intelligence Committee released over 50 transcripts last week of closed door hearings with major Democrats like James Clapper, Sally Yates, and Susan Rice where they all said they had not seen any evidence of colluding with Russians by the Trump administration. At the time of those interviews Adam Schiff was publicly saying numerous times that he had seen documents that proved Trump had colluded with Russians. After the Mueller report came out he couldn't produce any such documents and to date hasn't. The soft coup that was attempted is unraveling and looks like quite a few will be held accountable. Go ahead and put up the smiley faces and creative symbols. He who laughs last laughs loudest. What is really sad is I think some of you are ok with all of this because it's against Republicans. You'll certainly not want to see it done to a Democrat but if you don't support efforts to make everyone abide by the Constitution then that's what you'll get eventually.
"Democrats like James Clapper, Sally Yates, and Susan Rice where they all said they had not seen any evidence of colluding with Russians by the Trump administration."

They did not.
 
M

MenInBrown

Guest
Now Dr Birx is calling out the CDC for inflating Covid stats.

“Birx and others were frustrated with the CDC’s antiquated system for tracking virus data, which they worried was inflating some statistics — such as mortality rate and case count — by as much as 25 percent, according to four people present for the discussion or later briefed on it. Two senior administration officials said the discussion was not heated.

“‘There is nothing from the CDC that I can trust,’ Birx said, according to two of the people.”

HOAX 2020
 
Top