President Trump

[ImWaitingForTheDay]

Memo:"Mr. President, DO NOT PRAISE AUSTIN BOMBER!" – White House Staff

 

[vantexan]

Here's a news flash for all you Drumpf lovers. You have no clue as to what Mueller has or does not have. Sumple truth.

Same for all you Trump haters too.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

Just restored Internet (TV and Phone) after being struck by lightning Monday night.
Glad to see I didn't miss anything!

 

[It will be fine]

Just restored Internet (TV and Phone) after being struck by lightning Monday night.
Glad to see I didn't miss anything!

You were struck by lightning?! Tinfoil hats will do that.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

Excellent, that's clearly the measure of 'Presidentiality', to invent a word.

Great, he's a fat that likes to screw porn star bimbos, cheers.

How far the Mighty have fallen...

You talking about Kennedy?

 

[BrownArmy]

You talking about Kennedy?

Nope, talking about Trump.

What's up with the 'moral-equivalency' brigade?

Is Kennedy President?

 

[Old Man Jingles]

Nope, talking about Trump.

What's up with the 'moral-equivalency' brigade?

Is Kennedy President?

Just trying to inject some perspective on certain people's faux indignation.
It's as silly as all the goober stuff the Repugs were saying about Obama.
But it's OK ... carry on.

 

[Jones]

Whataboutism (also known as whataboutery) is a variant of the tu quoque logical fallacy that attempts to discredit an opponent's position by charging them with hypocrisy without directly refuting or disproving their argument, which is particularly associated with Soviet and Russian propaganda.When criticisms were leveled at the Soviet Union, the Soviet response would be "What about..." followed by an event in the Western world.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

Nope, talking about Trump.

What's up with the 'moral-equivalency' brigade?

Is Kennedy President?

No, she's an entertainer on the FOX Political Network.

 

[BrownArmy]

Whataboutism (also known as whataboutery) is a variant of the tu quoque logical fallacy that attempts to discredit an opponent's position by charging them with hypocrisy without directly refuting or disproving their argument, which is particularly associated with Soviet and Russian propaganda.When criticisms were leveled at the Soviet Union, the Soviet response would be "What about..." followed by an event in the Western world.

Yah, there's that.

Sigh.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

Whataboutism (also known as whataboutery) is a variant of the tu quoque logical fallacy that attempts to discredit an opponent's position by charging them with hypocrisy without directly refuting or disproving their argument, which is particularly associated with Soviet and Russian propaganda.When criticisms were leveled at the Soviet Union, the Soviet response would be "What about..." followed by an event in the Western world.

I remember that from the Bush and Obama years.

 

[BrownArmy]

Just trying to inject some perspective on certain people's faux indignation.
It's as silly as all the goober stuff the Repugs were saying about Obama.
But it's OK ... carry on.

There's plenty of information freely available that would lead one to be indignant about Trump.

Same could be said about Lincoln, Jefferson, Bush, Obama, Taft...

 

[BrownArmy]

I remember that from the Bush and Obama years.

Why do you think it's different now?

 

[Old Man Jingles]

Why do you think it's different now?

I don't ... I think it is pretty much the same.
It's basically funny and I like funny.

 

[BrownArmy]

I don't ... I think it is pretty much the same.
It's basically funny and I like funny.

Absolutely, there’s nothing wrong, just go about your business.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

Absolutely, there’s nothing wrong, just go about your business.

Thanks, I wasn't sure about that until now.

 

[newfie]

Nope, talking about Trump.

What's up with the 'moral-equivalency' brigade?

Is Kennedy President?

ah moral-equivalency not allowed if it wrecks the hate message. got you hypocrite.

 

[newfie]

Whataboutism (also known as whataboutery) is a variant of the tu quoque logical fallacy that attempts to discredit an opponent's position by charging them with hypocrisy without directly refuting or disproving their argument, which is particularly associated with Soviet and Russian propaganda.When criticisms were leveled at the Soviet Union, the Soviet response would be "What about..." followed by an event in the Western world.

sounds like a bunch of internet mumbo -jumbo. hypocrisy is a very valid counter argument to a party's supporters who have idolized past presidents who exhibited the same or worse traits as those they suddenly find theirselves morally objecting to.

 

[newfie]

Nope, talking about Trump.

What's up with the 'moral-equivalency' brigade?

Is Kennedy President?

speaking of which little did they know they would share so much white house sleaze in common when they met

 

[Old Man Jingles]

speaking of which little did they know they would share so much white house sleaze in common when they met

Is that Trump?