Presidential debates!! 2012
- Thread starter The Other Side
- Start date
wkmac
Well-Known Member
Let's do some math here just for fun. Let's take that 47% figure and look at it another way. In any typical election on average, about 47% of lawful eligible voters don't vote at all so let's factor them out now. This leaves us with 53% so let's remove Romney's 47% from that number. According to Romney, you have to vote in order to extend the welfare state so after taking out the 47% non-voter and the Romney's welfare queens of 47%, we are left with only 28% of total population voting.
Now we have to remove the 1% also because they use the state for their own welfare needs and then I'd take out an additional 10% for those upper bracket hanger-ons who are able at some level to profit from state subsidy and welfare towards the business side of the ledger. Maybe this also accounts for some profit taking on the public welfare side bu Corp. business interests but hide behind the welfare recipient being used as a human shield.
So now we are down to about 22% of actual productive folk who vote and I would contend the bulk of those are working, middle class folk who the best they can live their lives on their own nickles and bust their
to make the world work as best they can make it. I'd also contend that many of the original 47% who are smart enough to just say "FVK IT" also would be in the same camp as the 22%ers. As to the 22% who vote, somehow they've come to see either side as friend and yet this "friend" is bleeding them dry as well as any vampire.The point, it's not the real backbone of America that decides the course of American, the 22%ers that is but it sure as hell is the one's who ultimately pay for it, whether to those up above the income scale on down below the income scale. The fact is, this backbone of America, it's working heart, is being bled dry by 2 different vampires. It's long past due that the 22% start driving wooden stacks into the hearts of the blood suckers!
ALL OF THEM!
This song sung to the tune of ""99 Bottles of beer on the wall""
M
MenInBrown
Guest
M
MenInBrown
Guest
you are so misinformed.
menotyou
bella amicizia
How? Romney has flip flopped on the issue of abortion.
As far as Obamacare, it was based partly on Romney's Massachusettscare.
Babagounj
Strength through joy
The only place to watch tonight’s presidential debate is on C-SPAN.
You know what everyone on every network except Fox is going to say. Comrade Chris Matthews’ leg is going to be tingling out of control. Sgt. Ed Schultz and Rachel Maddow will be breathlessly reading phony stories from the Internet about dissension in the GOP ranks.
On CNN, “Republicans” Alex Castellanos and David Gergen will compare Barack’s closing statement to the Gettysburg Address and the Sermon on the Mount. David Brooks will swoon as he notes the perfect crease in Obama’s trousers.
All of these trust-funded parrots — the pundits, the bow-tied bumkissers, the throne sniffers — will agree that it’s all over and Mitt might as well throw in the towel.
Talk about marching in “lockstep,” to use a favorite word of both U.S. Sen. Scott Brown and Granny Warren on Monday night in Lowell.
But don’t let the Democratic agitprop get you down. Just watch the debate on C-SPAN and then, as soon as it’s over, flip over to a radio talk show, or the Internet.
The courtiers on the alphabet networks are just trying to depress you. They want you to stay home on Nov. 6. This is always done in campaigns — in World War II, the Axis had Tokyo Rose and Lord Haw-Haw spouting propaganda to the Allies over shortwave radio. Of course, the difference is, they were broadcasting from behind enemy lines.
Tonight’s Lord Haw-Haws will be trying to destroy morale from posh TV studios in New York and Washington. They ride around the East Side in limousines, make seven-figure salaries and summer on Nantucket. They’re the one percent.
Some have speculated that the network touts might try to keep Mitt viable, to goose ratings and keep a semblance of a horse race going. That may have been true until recent times, but now, the watchdogs are lapdogs. They can’t help themselves. They worship at Barack’s feet.
How can it be that Mitt Romney putting his dog in a crate on the roof of his car is approximately 100 times as big a story as Barack Obama actually eating one in Indonesia?
But there’s good news. For a lot of these obsequious, squirrely Uriah Heeps, this is the last go-around. Their newspapers — and maybe networks — aren’t going to exist in another four years. Re-electing Obama only will hasten the demise of the lame-streams.
Your average elite reporter is about as truthful as Granny Warren. Think “fake but accurate,” a famous headline about a hoax “60 Minutes” fabricated for the Democrats in 2004.
Here’s another example of fake news. On Jan. 10, 2010, the Sunday Globe ran a front-page story about Marsha Coakley’s commanding lead in the Senate race with nine days to go.
“Democrat Martha Coakley ... enjoys a solid, 15-percentage-point lead over Republican rival Scott Brown as the race for U.S. Senate enters the homestretch, according to a new Boston Globe poll of likely voters. ... Coakley’s lead grows to 17 points — 53 to 36 — when undecideds leaning toward a candidate are included in the tally.”
Nine days later, Scott Brown won, 53-47. Anyone know what channel C-SPAN is on in Brighton?
By Howie Carr
You know what everyone on every network except Fox is going to say. Comrade Chris Matthews’ leg is going to be tingling out of control. Sgt. Ed Schultz and Rachel Maddow will be breathlessly reading phony stories from the Internet about dissension in the GOP ranks.
On CNN, “Republicans” Alex Castellanos and David Gergen will compare Barack’s closing statement to the Gettysburg Address and the Sermon on the Mount. David Brooks will swoon as he notes the perfect crease in Obama’s trousers.
All of these trust-funded parrots — the pundits, the bow-tied bumkissers, the throne sniffers — will agree that it’s all over and Mitt might as well throw in the towel.
Talk about marching in “lockstep,” to use a favorite word of both U.S. Sen. Scott Brown and Granny Warren on Monday night in Lowell.
But don’t let the Democratic agitprop get you down. Just watch the debate on C-SPAN and then, as soon as it’s over, flip over to a radio talk show, or the Internet.
The courtiers on the alphabet networks are just trying to depress you. They want you to stay home on Nov. 6. This is always done in campaigns — in World War II, the Axis had Tokyo Rose and Lord Haw-Haw spouting propaganda to the Allies over shortwave radio. Of course, the difference is, they were broadcasting from behind enemy lines.
Tonight’s Lord Haw-Haws will be trying to destroy morale from posh TV studios in New York and Washington. They ride around the East Side in limousines, make seven-figure salaries and summer on Nantucket. They’re the one percent.
Some have speculated that the network touts might try to keep Mitt viable, to goose ratings and keep a semblance of a horse race going. That may have been true until recent times, but now, the watchdogs are lapdogs. They can’t help themselves. They worship at Barack’s feet.
How can it be that Mitt Romney putting his dog in a crate on the roof of his car is approximately 100 times as big a story as Barack Obama actually eating one in Indonesia?
But there’s good news. For a lot of these obsequious, squirrely Uriah Heeps, this is the last go-around. Their newspapers — and maybe networks — aren’t going to exist in another four years. Re-electing Obama only will hasten the demise of the lame-streams.
Your average elite reporter is about as truthful as Granny Warren. Think “fake but accurate,” a famous headline about a hoax “60 Minutes” fabricated for the Democrats in 2004.
Here’s another example of fake news. On Jan. 10, 2010, the Sunday Globe ran a front-page story about Marsha Coakley’s commanding lead in the Senate race with nine days to go.
“Democrat Martha Coakley ... enjoys a solid, 15-percentage-point lead over Republican rival Scott Brown as the race for U.S. Senate enters the homestretch, according to a new Boston Globe poll of likely voters. ... Coakley’s lead grows to 17 points — 53 to 36 — when undecideds leaning toward a candidate are included in the tally.”
Nine days later, Scott Brown won, 53-47. Anyone know what channel C-SPAN is on in Brighton?
By Howie Carr
HAHAHAHAHa......boy, are you out of the loop. ROMNEY is the biggest flip flopper in presidential history, saying anything to get elected.
He is not a candidate of "CONVICTION" and rather, is a candidate of "CONVENIENCE".
Whatever the GOP wants to hear he will say, even if he has to contradict himself.
If you believe otherwise, then you are unqualified to comment on politics.
Peace
TOS
Amazing how you left out FOX NEWS talking heads, RUSH LIMBAUGHs take, Sean Hannitys take, Greta Van MANSTERNs take and all the right wing as a whole that will come out and either defend something stupid ROMNEY says, or simply talk about how presidential he sounded.
The american public will get to see ROMNEY unplugged tonight, no more speeches of empty content and promises. No more speeches about freedom and the american dream. NO FLUFF.
If they do, and ROMNEY just comes out saying the same Crap he says on the campaign trail, then the american public will know he isnt ready for primetime.
I would like to see OBAMA get him rattled and watch as he implodes on stage. I would like the questioners to ask him a question that he attempts to duck, and then re ask it again to him and watch him duck it again as he did in the GOP debates.
The american public will see right through Mitt Romney.
Peace
TOS
moreluck
golden ticket member
You've now mentioned it a couple times, but Rush doesn't work for FOX.
Hannity's take, Greta's take ?? They don't have a new's show, it's an opinion show.....Get over it.
island1fox
Well-Known Member
MSNBC,NBC CNN,CBS, ABC, have just reported that President Obama won the debate against Romney.
They went on to say Obama was gaff free,eloquent, Presidential, inspiring, had all the answers, solutions, was PERFECT.
Romney did not tell the truth, no solutions that made sense, not Presidential, stupid, arrogant rich guy.
Opps they ran THEIR true feelings --not the news --a day early !!
Believe in the free press--our watchdogs will always report unbiased and true.
On a serious note --when the free press has decided that they will choose our President --What does that say for our Futures ??
They went on to say Obama was gaff free,eloquent, Presidential, inspiring, had all the answers, solutions, was PERFECT.
Romney did not tell the truth, no solutions that made sense, not Presidential, stupid, arrogant rich guy.
Opps they ran THEIR true feelings --not the news --a day early !!
Believe in the free press--our watchdogs will always report unbiased and true.On a serious note --when the free press has decided that they will choose our President --What does that say for our Futures ??
MSNBC,NBC CNN,CBS, ABC, have just reported that President Obama won the debate against Romney.
They went on to say Obama was gaff free,eloquent, Presidential, inspiring, had all the answers, solutions, was PERFECT.
Romney did not tell the truth, no solutions that made sense, not Presidential, stupid, arrogant rich guy.
Opps they ran THEIR true feelings --not the news --a day early !!
On a serious note --when the free press has decided that they will choose our President --What does that say for our Futures ??
What choice does the free press have when the GOP candidates REFUSE to talk to them? What choice do they have when the only place they will do interviews is in the sanctuary of FOX NEWS or right wing radio??
Everytime Romney has gone outside the loop of FOX, he has made blunders, and the GOP campaign has deliberately kept him away from all media.
What does that say about your candidate??
Get real bro.
peace
TOS
wkmac
Well-Known Member
You could always spend the 1.5 hours getting hammered, tape the debate and then when you watch you can fast forward the commercials!
MrFedEx
Engorged Member
I just got home too. Is it possible to watch a candidate (the Mormon one) who only gives multiple-choice answers to every question actually give a single answer to one of them? Maybe someone should slip Mitt a drink...it might improve his performance.
M
MenInBrown
Guest
After a while you'll get tired of responding to TOS...you just cant fix stupid.
The know all of his politics but hes on BC
M
MenInBrown
Guest
Trust me, you'll get drunk enough listening to OBAMA tell lie, after lie, after lie, after lie!
Similar threads
