Progress made in the Third & Fourth Rounds of UPS Contract Negotiations

brown_trousers

Well-Known Member
About a decade ago. The market tumbled, some of the other players in our plan went out of business. More people retired and less and less are putting in.

I wonder why they don't put protections into those multi-employer plans. Something to the effect of;
all pension money contributed by UPS, can only be paid out to UPS employees. Thereby eliminating the possibility of our pensions dollars bailing out non-UPSers
 
I wonder why they don't put protections into those multi-employer plans. Something to the effect of;
all pension money contributed by UPS, can only be paid out to UPS employees.
That is was of the things that are looking at. Some sort of a hybrid plan.


I'm just sick and tired of the double talk. Make some small cuts now, so it isn't as bad in the future.
 

brown_trousers

Well-Known Member
I'm just sick and tired of the double talk. Make some small cuts now, so it isn't as bad in the future.

I agree. I cant understand why so many people oppose that. Its simple math. take a small reduction early on and continue to collect benefits till you die. or demand a higher benefit, and the whole thing goes bankrupt in a few years, and then you get little to nothing for the rest of your life.

It seems like a simple step in logic to understand that you would benefit more from taking the small benefit cut now, versus losing everything later on
 
I agree. I cant understand why so many people oppose that. Its simple math. take a small reduction early on and continue to collect benefits till you die. or demand a higher benefit, and get a little more money for a few shorts years until the whole thing goes bankrupt, and then get little to nothing for the rest of your life.

It seems like a simple step in logic to understand that you would benefit more from taking the small benefit cut now, versus losing everything later on
Answer=. Nobody has the balls to do the right thing.
 
Top