Not so. The intelligence is there on North Korea and look, no war.If you believe the intelligence, then you may have your reason to wage war......and that's what happened
Not so. The intelligence is there on North Korea and look, no war.If you believe the intelligence, then you may have your reason to wage war......and that's what happened
Not so. The intelligence is there on North Korea and look, no war.
They say that when the student is ready, the master will appearNot so. The intelligence is there on North Korea and look, no war.
Isreal rarely complies with the United Nations but nobody invades them (rightly so).Everyone here is over looking (why we went to Iraq) one very important fact; Iraq never complied with the cease fire agreement of Desert Storm; to allow the UN inspectors full access. If you can recall the failure of Iraq to follow these orders, which resulted in several UN violations decrees being issued. Was all the motivation needed. The line of WMD was just a public relations line for the media to grab. The fact that some here still follow this phantom line is testament that you are just a typical mind-less sheep.
Everyone here is over looking (why we went to Iraq) one very important fact; Iraq never complied with the cease fire agreement of Desert Storm; to allow the UN inspectors full access. If you can recall the failure of Iraq to follow these orders, which resulted in several UN violations decrees being issued. Was all the motivation needed. The line of WMD was just a public relations line for the media to grab. The fact that some here still follow this phantom line is testament that you are just a typical mind-less sheep.
The korean war was never declared over, thus a state of war still exists today.
Not so. The intelligence is there on North Korea and look, no war.
In all the debate over whether or not there was WMD in Iraq, the powers that be framed the debate so the most important question of all is not asked nor discussed. That Question!
Who and where did Saddam Hussien get the WMD and the technology to make it? Once you understand that, it's then very reasonable to understand why no WMD was found all while at the same time the conclusive claim is made that he had them to begin with.
How the United States Illegally Armed Saddam Hussein
Arming Iraq: How the U.S. and Britain Secretly Built Saddam's War Machine
Not that we've not built and financed our enemies before!
[video=google;6244851259954264539]
I think a poll in the eighties would have shown americans overwhelmingly willing to support Iraq in its war against then hated Iran. In fact as much hatred as us citizens felt towards iran I would think our citizens in the 80's would have been incensed if we had chosen neutrality over supporting iraq against Iran. We often takes sides and changes sides as do other countries.
there waa never a decllaration of war against north korea.
what you are overlooking is that jr. went over to finish what daddy couldn't
The Republicans continue to filibuster any attempt to pass the bill. Last time I looked, it only took a majority of the 100 senators to pass a bill, unless there is a filibuster, which requires 60 votes to close debate on the filibuster.so you too must believe in Congress' refusal to extend the jobless benefits is totally due to those nasty republicans, who are not in the majority in this session.
And we sold him those chemical weapons....go back to the Reagan administration, and see which guys have photos taken shaking hands with Mr. Saddam Hussein. And never let us forget Iran-Contra, another Ronnie Ray-Gun movie script from hell.did your research tell you about Hussien using chemical weapons on the kurds or did you choose to ignore that point in this discussion? How about chemical weapons in the war with Iran?
I agree with you in every particular, except that it is impossible to bomb them BACK to the Stone Age, since they have never really LEFT the Stone Age. More bombs simply bounce the rubble around a little bit.you are a fool how long was russia over there. nobody ever is going to win a war over there unless you nuke them back into the stone age. is that what you want?
I think a poll in the eighties would have shown americans overwhelmingly willing to support Iraq in its war against then hated Iran. In fact as much hatred as us citizens felt towards iran I would think our citizens in the 80's would have been incensed if we had chosen neutrality over supporting iraq against Iran. We often takes sides and changes sides as do other countries.
The Republicans continue to filibuster any attempt to pass the bill. Last time I looked, it only took a majority of the 100 senators to pass a bill, unless there is a filibuster, which requires 60 votes to close debate on the filibuster.
Any factual analysis of the voting records of the Senate since the Democrats took a majority in 2006 shows clearly that the Republicans have used the filibuster far more times than at any other time in the history of the nation.
Let the bill go for an up or down vote, Mitch McConnell.
Name me those others, Iraq ?
.
And, of course, we supported ANOTHER despotic dictator, namely Saddam Hussein, in his war with Iran. We didn't care about his internal politics, or his war crimes then, because he was fighting a country whose regime wasn't to our liking. So we sold him those chemical weapons of mass destruction, and turned a blind eye to how he used them.
And that's why the Iranian government is so successful with their propaganda painting us as the enemy of the Iranian people.
It's history, go look it up. That last link, in particular...
http://www.nytimes.com/library/world/mideast/041600iran-cia-index.html
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB28/
http://www.fff.org/comment/com0501i.asp
Oh, one further footnote: the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, that was being nationalized by the Iranian government that the CIA overthrew? It later changed its name to British Petroleum....