Up_and_at_UPS
Coffee box sniffer
Anyone know when UPS pays retro pay if an employee is terminated or resigns? Do they pay out immediately, since they are no longer an employee, or do they wait till the contract is ratified?
Anyone know when UPS pays retro pay if an employee is terminated or resigns? Do they pay out immediately, since they are no longer an employee, or do they wait till the contract is ratified?
My guess would be no since you did not work under the new contract, but everyone is just guessing here.
I guessing at all since he never worked under the contract that said he would get a raise. Contract has not passed yet, so none of us get the benefits, like pension increases until it does, and we work a day under it.
The ratification and effective dates of our contracts are normally the same day; however, this year it obviously will not be. The contract will be ratified with an effective date of Aug 1, 2013, and any hours worked on or after that date will be paid at the appropriate rate. You do not need to work a day under the new contract to receive retro pay.
Pension increases will be handled in the same manner.
Nobody really knows for sure is all I am saying. We shall see when it does finally passes.The ratification and effective dates of our contracts are normally the same day; however, this year it obviously will not be. The contract will be ratified with an effective date of Aug 1, 2013, and any hours worked on or after that date will be paid at the appropriate rate. You do not need to work a day under the new contract to receive retro pay.
Pension increases will be handled in the same manner.
I guessing at all since he never worked under the contract that said he would get a raise. Contract has not passed yet, so none of us get the benefits, like pension increases until it does, and we work a day under it.
The National contract HAS passed some local riders have not.
Does it really matter? UPS could very easily not pay. The union is not going to fight for an ex member. The ex-employee could sue, but would hardly be worth the effort. Perhaps a class action suit of some sort, but again it would not be worth it....for the lawyers anyway.The National contract HAS passed some local riders have not.
Retroactive pay is pay which an employee is owed for work which has already been completed. It is often made up in the form of a lump sum in which the difference between what the employee was paid and what the employee should have been paid is made over in a check. Sometimes an agreement may be reached in which the employer disburses small payments with each paycheck until the difference has been made up. There are a number of reasons why people might be entitled to retroactive pay.
The most common reason for this situation to occur is ongoing labor negotiations. While negotiations are underway, the employer continues to pay employees at the established rate. When the negotiations are over, they may include a clause that employees are entitled to retroactive pay, starting on a set date, because part of the agreement includes a wage increase. The employer is required to make up the difference as part of the overall enactment of the agreement.
Why wouldn't the seasonal person get it as well, if one gets it the other should as well. They get a percentage of starting driver rate here(believe it is 80%). If starting rate goes up, then helper pay goes up.UPS has no wiggle room on this in regard to permanent employees, whether they are still working here or have separated. Any permanent employee who has worked on or after 1 Aug 13 will receive retro pay.
I am not sure if seasonal employees will receive retro pay----I don't think they will as they were hired at a specific pay rate.
Passed and ratified are not one in the same.
You have got to be consistent with your logic, that is what I am going for. Neither is working when contract goes into effect......this is why I said "I am not sure" as I honestly don't know how seasonals will be treated.... My gut says they were hired at a set rate and will not receive retro pay.
You have got to be consistent with your logic, that is what I am going for. Neither is working when contract goes into effect.