Saul Alinski and Obama's 8 levels of control that must be obtained to change us to a socialist state

[wkmac]

You people think "A". I'm incapable of offering any reasonable or rational argument for or against "A" but I must respond. My cognitive dissonance demands I respond in order to keep my prior beliefs intact.

Therefore I will call you names and feel vindicated as if having won the argument!

 

[The Other Side]

You people hold in high regards radicals and communists. Says a lot about the TROLLS.

And you hold high the garbage you are sold by the overpaid talking heads that fill your head with nothing more than hot air.

I bet when you came across this particular garbage, you couldnt wait to get to your computer and repeat it.

Who's the idiot now?

TOS.

 

[Babagounj]

 

[Sportello]

Obama is nowhere near a Socialist. Nice troll job, though.

 

[wkmac]

Obama is a socialist in the same way Newt Gingrich, Ted Cruz and even Sarah Palin are.

 

[Sportello]

Obama is a socialist in the same way Newt Gingrich, Ted Cruz and even Sarah Palin are.

All for one and one for all!

 

[wkmac]

Pretty much how I see them.

 

[realbrown1]

Obama is nowhere near a Socialist. Nice troll job, though.

Wrong.

 

[realbrown1]

Obama is a socialist in the same way Newt Gingrich, Ted Cruz and even Sarah Palin are.

Wrong.

 

[realbrown1]

Pretty much how I see them.

Though slanted eyes I'm sure. You hate everyone and everything.

 

[wkmac]

Though slanted eyes I'm sure. You hate everyone and everything.

You are finally starting to figure it out! Congrats.

 

[wkmac]

Wrong.

BTW RB, I see you in the same way I see Gingrich, Cruz and Palin so there you go. However instead of the word socialist, I use the word Statist. I see TOS and Sportello the same way too so at least in my eyes you ALL know where you stand with me.

 

[The Other Side]

BTW RB, I see you in the same way I see Gingrich, Cruz and Palin so there you go. However instead of the word socialist, I use the word Statist. I see TOS and Sportello the same way too so at least in my eyes you ALL know where you stand with me.

The real point is... WHO CARES?

TOS.

 

[realbrown1]

I see

BTW RB, I see you in the same way I see Gingrich, Cruz and Palin so there you go. However instead of the word socialist, I use the word Statist. I see TOS and Sportello the same way too so at least in my eyes you ALL know where you stand with me.

I see TOS and his gang as liberal democratic brainwashed yes men. Incapable of any real meaningful thought.
I see you as an angry brat, mad at both sides, who just wants to burn both sides down. Pathetic.

 

[wkmac]

The real point is... WHO CARES?

TOS.

I see

I see TOS and his gang as liberal democratic brainwashed yes men. Incapable of any real meaningful thought.
I see you as an angry brat, mad at both sides, who just wants to burn both sides down. Pathetic.

Thank you both as you made my day!

 

[Catatonic]

Thank you both as you made my day!

How do keep interacting is beyond me ... must be amusing to you.

 

[wkmac]

How do keep interacting is beyond me ... must be amusing to you.

Very! I could pose the same question of you in other forums here so I assumed among anyone in BC, you among anyone else would understand the method to the madness.

 

[wkmac]

And back to Saul Alinsky quoting from his 1971' book Rules for Radicals:

“To pander to those who have no stomach for straight language, and insist upon bland, non-controversial sauces, is a waste of time . . . . We approach a critical point when our tongues trap our minds. I do not propose to be trapped by tact at the expense of truth . . . . To travel down the sweeter-smelling, peaceful, more socially acceptable, more respectable, indefinite byways, ends in a failure to achieve an honest understanding of the issues that we must come to grips with if we are to do the job.”

I like that quote!

 

[wkmac]

Baba, If you and others actually read Alinsky, you'd find he was as critical of socialist states as he was our own and more often than not for the same reasons. And more often than not he was right.

 

[bbsam]

A socialist state? Like China? That does global capitalism almost as well as we do? (Possibly better if you consider their massive investment in Africa. )