UnionStrong
Sorry, but I don’t care anymore.
ReparationsWhere is this happening? When we see gangs rampaging through jewelry stores in rich San Francisco and nothing is happening to them do you think it's because of lack of funding?
ReparationsWhere is this happening? When we see gangs rampaging through jewelry stores in rich San Francisco and nothing is happening to them do you think it's because of lack of funding?
Of course it's a lack of funding. If nobody will take the job and the risks involved because the pay is too low then there will not be a presence large enough to make would be criminals reconsider their actions. Departments and agencies will put as many police officers on the street as you demand provided that you are willing to foot the bill.Where is this happening? When we see gangs rampaging through jewelry stores in rich San Francisco and nothing is happening to them do you think it's because of lack of funding?
Rich San Francisco lacks funds? Seriously? How about the liberal district attorney refused to prosecute thus emboldening criminals?Of course it's a lack of funding. If nobody will take the job and the risks involved because the pay is too low then there will not be a presence large enough to make would be criminals reconsider their actions. Departments and agencies will put as many police officers on the street as you demand provided that you are willing to foot the bill.
Those store owners will likely turn in a claim to their business insurance carriers. Those carriers can and likely will demand that the store owners undertake much more anti theft measures along with better store security measures.
And conservative district attorneys prosecute every case they are presented with? lmao. Developing and presenting a case compelling enough to have a decent chance at a conviction requires tons of compensated manhours. Often the case cannot be made strong enough to get that conviction. There isn't a single DA out there who doesn't have to pick and chose. What good is it to prosecute a case if it doesn't have at least a fair chance at gaining a conviction? An acquittal is wasted and costly effort.Rich San Francisco lacks funds? Seriously? How about the liberal district attorney refused to prosecute thus emboldening criminals?
Describe freeloaders? Be specific.So to sum up all of these long winded posts....
Democrats are pro crime because they would rather spend your tax dollars on handouts for freeloaders than on keeping you safe.
fixed it for you.So to sum up all of these long winded posts....
Republicans are pro crime because they would rather spend your tax dollars on handouts for billionaires than on keeping you safe.
fixed it for you.
I pointed out that the Democrat in here says we can't stop crime because it would cost too much.fixed it for you.
You're the guy who singled out a group of people attacked and slandered them by calling them "freeloaders. And you accuse me of making personal attacks.?Describe freeloaders? Be specific.
Such is the extent of their cult like delusion that they project their own insane philosophy on others. Republicans want to defund the cops? Pro crime? Leftist’s are truly mentally ill.I pointed out that the Democrat in here says we can't stop crime because it would cost too much.
I haven't heard any republicans say we can't stop crime because it would cost too much.
Can you name some?
I don't think you can.
You seem to be uninformed. George Soros funded a bunch of Democratic district attorneys to win office and they all announced they wouldn't prosecute certain crimes. Quite a list of crimes actually. The San Francisco D.A. was booted because of it. There was a recall attempt in L.A. County because of it. Ron DeSantis suspended a state attorney because of it. The districts these guys controlled encompassed 70 million people. So yes, it's very much about district attorneys refusing to prosecute, period. They don't even bother with the merits of the case.And conservative district attorneys prosecute every case they are presented with? lmao. Developing and presenting a case compelling enough to have a decent chance at a conviction requires tons of compensated manhours. Often the case cannot be made strong enough to get that conviction. There isn't a single DA out there who doesn't have to pick and chose. What good is it to prosecute a case if it doesn't have at least a fair chance at gaining a conviction? An acquittal is wasted and costly effort.
Neither you or any of your like minded friends here have offered a single idea when to comes to a fair and equitable taxation method by which the public can provide the additional funding law enforcement nationwide says it needs in order to give you the results you demand.
Are you attacking yourself here?You're the guy who singled out a group of people attacked and slandered them by calling them "freeloaders. And you accuse me of making personal attacks.?
What group of people did I call freeloaders?You're the guy who singled out a group of people attacked and slandered them by calling them "freeloaders. And you accuse me of making personal attacks.?
What is about the word underfunded you don't understand. I'm the guy who right at the beginning of this ridiculous discussion plainly stated that law enforcement cannot provide you people with the level of protection you demand with the current level of funding the public makes available to them. Those are the facts and they have no reason to lie about. But as long as that appeal for increased funding falls on deaf ears then from a standpoint of police protection....what you see is what you get.I pointed out that the Democrat in here says we can't stop crime because it would cost too much.
I haven't heard any republicans say we can't stop crime because it would cost too much.
Can you name some?
I don't think you can.
What are you accusing me of being?Are you attacking yourself here?
I understand the word underfunded.What is about the word underfunded you don't understand.
I agree it's ridiculous.I'm the guy who right at the beginning of this ridiculous discussion
Sounds like we're in agreement that we need to cut the silly left wing wasteful spending and fund our police.law enforcement cannot provide you people with the level of protection you demand with the current level of funding the public makes available to them
Whether a person is pro la enforcement or anti law enforcement means nothing without a full fledged public commitment to fulfill the funding needs. You can judge the performance of the system afterward.I understand the word underfunded.
I agree it's ridiculous.
Sounds like we're in agreement that we need to cut the silly left wing wasteful spending and fund our police.
You quoted yourself and jumped all over yourself. Fascinating.What are you accusing me of being?
Go back and read your post. You're the guy who plainly stated calling them "freeloaders. In response I ask you to describe the term "freeloaders".What group of people did I call freeloaders?