Next contract? Didn't that just happen in this one with the 22.4 scheme and the PT start wage bump?Can you imagine what would happen if the next contract reduced FT wages and increased PT wages?
Next contract? Didn't that just happen in this one with the 22.4 scheme and the PT start wage bump?Can you imagine what would happen if the next contract reduced FT wages and increased PT wages?
We were on the picket line from about September 9, 1976 until one week before Christmas. Over three months.I was on the picket line in May of '76. I know some supplements stayed out, (Pennsylvania as I recall) but in the Central we were back after two weeks. Still the best contract money wise in my memory. 3 years, $.65, .50 and .50 with those last two years COLA adjusted to .74 and .72. Not bad as the FT wage going in was $7.31.
I know of no non union company that offers a pension to part time employees.
As far as the raises go, we have had better contracts. The increase in starting pay for part timers was not something won by the union but rather given by the company because they knew they had to just to keep up. At the end of the 5 years part timers will be right where today’s minimum wage is in many parts of the country.This is the first contract in decades that actually makes significant increases to starting pay. Long overdue.
FT drivers will be making $40/hr.
As far as the raises go, we have had better contracts.
Then it was the 1966 cba.Which one ?
I have a copy of every contract book (from my region).... going back to 1968.
Then it was the 1966 cba.
How bout that?
But with free family benefits after about 36 weeks of employment.As far as the raises go, we have had better contracts. The increase in starting pay for part timers was not something won by the union but rather given by the company because they knew they had to just to keep up. At the end of the 5 years part timers will be right where today’s minimum wage is in many parts of the country.
Great.It gets better then.
There weren't even regional agreements yet.... would need to know the Local.
Seriously.
But with free family benefits after about 36 weeks of employment.
That's a $1400.00 raise that equals another $20/hr at a guarantee of 70 hrs per month.
Think about it.
Thanks for taking time to explain that info. The starting hourly wage for part time is messed up.So in 2008 the union potentially conceded $14,000 for every new part-time employee when they made the waiting period longer. Didn't it go from 2 months to 12 months at that time? This was on top of the two tiered progression that came in during that same contract.
So, even with it going back to 9 months this contract, this means a new part-time employee will most likely be working without a raise for at least their first two years when compared to a pre-2008 employee. They gained a $5,000 a year starting wage increase but lost $10,000 in potential insurance benefits in months 2-9 of employment. By this I mean the cost to UPS for that same, new employee over their first two years of employment is the same now as it was in 2007 without pension contributions factored in.
Think about how bad the union screwed them over in 2008... unbelievable!
Time to move on dude, don’t you think“We are at a loss to understand the National Committees [sic] reasoning as to why they would implement such a substandard agreement for Western Pa.,” Bedillion wrote.
Teamsters Union Faces Revolt From Members Over UPS Contracts
As far as the raises go, we have had better contracts. The increase in starting pay for part timers was not something won by the union but rather given by the company because they knew they had to just to keep up. At the end of the 5 years part timers will be right where today’s minimum wage is in many parts of the country.
A REVOLT....... HA HA HA HA. The political hype train never stops here on browncafe. Voter turnout says it all, people just don't care.