So when a group of T's shoot a couple of hundred people in brussels the media should do a nice report on cherry blossoms at the Lincoln memorial instead?
see the fact that you so called conservatives here have such a hard time getting past the matrix of one kind of terrorism, tells me that theres something wrong where you get your news from.
my news sources will go out of their way to explain that governments kill way more people than the so called terrorists do, and my news will mention how relatively few people terrorism kills compared to cancer, heart disease, medical malpractice, etc.
IT IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE PEOPLE lol
i think the media should cover it relative to how many people are killed / injured by it. the media loves terrorism because theres explosions, or heads dropping, or limbs flying, theres weapons, etc. its very sensationalist, and very good for profits for big news. and as ive said before, the powers that be need you to be constantly afraid of somehting be it terrorists, russians, communism, germany, etc.
i just saw a poll the other day that 30% of republicans are concerned about terrorism. thats wayyy to high and that really says something about you.
if i remember, you are more likely to die falling in a bathtub, than from terrorism. terrorism is just that unlikely.