zubenelgenubi
I'm a star
Wait for the appeal. I would point out that predictions aren't "information", but I know you wouldn't understand what I meant.
The Derek Chauvin Trial
- Thread starter El Correcto
- Start date
Wait for the appeal. I would point out that predictions aren't "information", but I know you wouldn't understand what I meant.
oldngray
nowhere special
There are definitely grounds for it but the appeals court might wimp out and dodge the issue.
you base predictions on info. ur info was bad.
oldngray
nowhere special
There was no possibility of a fair trial without it being moved the first time. Plus the jury should have been sequestered. On top of that the comments by politicians alone should be grounds for a mistrial.
Babagounj
Strength through joy
How the Left repeatedly tried to derail Chauvin's trial
Democrats threatened to derail Derek Chauvin's murder trial on multiple occasions by ignoring Judge Peter Cahill's orders to stop talking about it because their comments could influence the jury.
trickpony1
Well-Known Member
Doe the verdict mean we whites can turn out in droves to riot, burn and loot?
Oh, wait.......
Oh, wait.......
Wow, those speeches from Harris and Biden...
This guy was a criminal who held a gun to a pregnant woman's stomach while he robbed her house.. He'd be alive now if he hadn't have been trying to pass phony money..
Yeah, I'm glad Chauvin was found guilty too, but they're playing it like Floyd was some kind of angel from heaven.
Named a bill after this loser? WTH...
This guy was a criminal who held a gun to a pregnant woman's stomach while he robbed her house.. He'd be alive now if he hadn't have been trying to pass phony money..
Yeah, I'm glad Chauvin was found guilty too, but they're playing it like Floyd was some kind of angel from heaven.
Named a bill after this loser? WTH...
zubenelgenubi
I'm a star
Like I said, you aren't able to understand simple concepts. My prediction was based on the undue optimism I had that there would be a hung jury, which seemed the most likely outcome based on the likelihood that half the jury had made up its mind beforehand, and at least a few jurors would hold out when presented with the actual evidence. I know these simple things are too complicated to understand, but basically the jury didn't hand down a verdict on Chauvin, the handed down an indictment of the injustice system.
It was as fair a trial as anyone gets. Take that however you like.
the verdict was guilty on all counts in case you missed it.
none of this would have happened if ppl didnt demand justice in the streets. the police system, the justice system is broken.
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
Yes it's called a lynch mob.
This makes me sick
no its called democracy and you only have the rights you have from people demanding it. thats how power works. remember only white men with property used to be able to vote.
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
None of that is relevant in any way.
Typical for you.
the country was founded on limiting democracy. power was taken from the few and given to the many becuase people demanded it and made a racket.
the only reason this cop is guilty is because people demanded a trial.
MAKAVELI
Well-Known Member
Take a toke but don't choke bro.
