The party of "family values" strikes again!
- Thread starter The Other Side
- Start date
realbrown1
Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
She is not guilty of anything for her personal e-mail being hacked.
Unless she has classified or top-secret documents on that e-mail.
Sportello
Well-Known Member
No one said she was guilty of anything, just not very smart.
What is it that you dont understand about her emails??
She can have Classified Emails in her system, IF they were marked classified, AFTER they were transmitted. It happens all the time.
Expost Facto rules then come into play.
You cannot be Charged for a crime, if the action became Illegal AFTER it occured.
The state department has already been crystal clear on this issue. They have stated some emails were deemed classified AFTER they were transmitted.
The same thing that Colin Powell did.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/05/u...kerry-condeleezza-rice-colin-powell.html?_r=0
Again, like Clinton, they used PRIVATE servers to transmit these emails.
But, you keep holding your breath for an indictment. It will be a laughing day for me at your expense when the FBI does nothing to Hillary and then you switch to blame Obama for interfering.
Of course, that will have no merit, but you and the others will say it anyways.
Just as a parrot would repeat anything they hear.
TOS.
realbrown1
Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
Almost nothing you just posted about is true.
An e-mail does not have to be marked "CLASSIFIED" or "TOP SECRET".
Just having those on her PRIVATE e-mail makes her GUILTY and she will spend time in prison.
realbrown1
Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
150 plus FBI agents on this case makes this more and more likely that she is guilty.
Unless they are wasting their own time.
Sportello
Well-Known Member
You don't seem to be able to follow a conversation. I was speaking of Palin, not Clinton. TTKU
realbrown1
Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
I have a one track mind when it comes to criminals like Hillary.
bottomups
Bad Moon Risen'
Don't hold your breath!
teamer
Well-Known Member
does reek of Clinton arrogance and stupidity.
Sportello
Well-Known Member
You give yourself too much credit.
realbrown1
Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
Coming from you, that means nothing.
bottomups
Bad Moon Risen'
You are sooo gullible. There are around 12 agents actively working this case!
MAKAVELI
Well-Known Member
More republican family values on display.
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/sex-scandal-gets-even-worse-alabama-governor
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/sex-scandal-gets-even-worse-alabama-governor
Exactly. The paper than ran the false story that 150 agents are working on the Hillary case, had to run a retraction of those numbers and now puts it at "less than 50" in order to try and save face.
Actually, there are less than 20 working the email case.
But, those inclined to watch fox news or read right wing papers like the Washington post, The weekly standard will believe and repeat everything they hear.
Brown
This is the classic example of repeating exactly what they hear despite the truth of the matter, which doesnt matter to them.
TOS.
This is the thought process of someone who doesnt think for himself or research a story before repeating it.
the only one wasting his time, is Brown, for buying into it.
The source for the story was a right wing operative whose credibility was refuted by none other than the FBI.
But shhhh, dont tell brown, moreluck, newfie or the other drones who will still believe there are 150 agents and Hillary will be charged.
TOS.
Last edited by a moderator:
newfie
Well-Known Member
so your one reference disputes the hundreds of other references that say there were at least 146 Fbi agents assigned. Sorry bud no points on this one. try again.
bottomups
Bad Moon Risen'
The only reference that counts is the FBI themselves. They say 12. Try again!
Similar threads
