F
Frankie's Friend
Guest
That's garbage.Btw, I have about 20 weeks worth more behind them that haven't been heard locally yet.
It's three year and counting space odyssey.
~Bbbl~™
That's garbage.Btw, I have about 20 weeks worth more behind them that haven't been heard locally yet.
It's three year and counting space odyssey.
~Bbbl~™
The honest leadership folks are not opposed to transparency.I for one an glad you try to explain the grievance process. I don't know if it is me but I seems way too complicated than it should be, it makes my head hurt. Local, State, Regional and National..Interpretations..factual cases..Panels are greek to most of us and I been around for a while. Most of us feel like Rudolph being left out the reindeer games, only the selected few on a need to know basis. Secret handshake and such, transparence never part of the procedure. I does cause a lot of distrust with today's membership with access to the internet, it appears to be antiquated, a throw back to the 50's and 60's way of Union business.
It needs upgrading badly, the pat answer that it always have been that way just does not cut it anymore. (Why?) and keep it simple would be appreciated by the overall membership.
The union chair of the panel is the same person each time?Yeah, right....?
Kind of like the hundreds of air drivers doing ground work grievances I have filed asking my Local and State Panel to forward to the National Air Committee as provided for in Article 40 of the Master?
~Grievances concerning violation or abuse of this shall be referred directly to the National Air Committee.~
Instead, the State Panel insists that they have jurisdiction of the issue, so I get jerked around and the Company continues to violate.
SMH
~Bbbl~™
The same guy who is the BA in another Local, who has to deal with the same Labor Manager as me???The union chair of the panel is the same person each time?
The same guy who is the BA in another Local, who has to deal with the same Labor Manager as me???
How do you spell "conflict of interest"???
Again, sometimes fact is stranger than fiction....
Can anyone tell me what will happen with the TCDs? I’m so close to a full time bid but absolutely DO NOT want to be 22.4 and get put back into warehouse work. I’ve climbed seniority for four years and will now get passed up for a full time position by warehouse scrubs who are willing to take the pay and hour cut to be 22.4?
that would be at 930, not dark yet. No one uses ORION. Its unsafe , dangerous and uselessView attachment 199954
My friend you didn't read it correctly it says 25 unless (and im paraphrasing here) UPS can show a need for more. So in reality 25 is a minWe will see how strict that 25% limit is. I do like that part. It limits the use of 224 drivers in place of rpcd.
What would happen if they open a new center or hub and only hire 22.4's positions, not in contract violation there...right
I was just reading that. Trying to show people the wages lmao gtfo! They know it’s about to get a big no so they are pulling all the stopsJust got a IBT propaganda text targeting PTers specifically
http://ibt.io/parttimefliers
So basically the way I read this, they are giving the part-timers no credit for service. They will just be making the same amount as a new hire for 2 years.Just got a IBT propaganda text targeting PTers specifically
http://ibt.io/parttimefliers
Just got a IBT propaganda text targeting PTers specifically
http://ibt.io/parttimefliers
EAM’s for an hour / Delivery Driver for 13 hours = Combo Driver!It was supposed to LOOK enough like a combo job to fool the membership... but let's not pretend either side ever intended it to BE a combo job.
That is your negotiated language?full time with less seniority can not bump part time with more here on the sort.
sorry you are in 407, that must be absolutely awfulJust got a IBT propaganda text targeting PTers specifically
http://ibt.io/parttimefliers