Integrity
Binge Poster
Because that is the bracket that they will find themselves, according to my idea at least.Why?
Because that is the bracket that they will find themselves, according to my idea at least.Why?
You do understand that a progressive tax topping out at 91% means that income above a certain amount is taxed at 91%? That lower amounts of income are taxed the same as everyone else?To all my BC Brethren,
I am firmly convinced that the scourge of American Society is the absurd accumulation of power resulting from the absurd accumulation of wealth.
In principle I am strongly in favor of a progressive income tax that de incentivizes this absurd accumulation of wealth and the resultant corrupt political power that goes along with it.
I have posted this elsewhere but I feel it need to be repeated here for possible discussion:
I have the suspicion that as long as the rich politicians and rich corporations that own them can keep the non-rich fighting the moral high ground issues for their political gain and that IMO they mostly regard from a political perspective their purposes will be furthered because the non-rich will not seek to address the real scourge of American society; the absurd accumulation of power through the absurd accumulation of wealth.
I am all for a new progressive income tax rate system that unashamedly taxes the richest of the rich up to 91% and the poorest of the poor 0%.
Disclaimer:
My idea would certainly would put me in the 0% bracket.
Sincerely,
I
If the scourge of America is identified and removed then doesn’t America and all Americans win .Well first off, you’re about as wrong here as you could be.
Secondly, I’m moving this discussion to current events, because I’m pretty sure this conversation is gonna get somewhat political.
Batman,You do understand that a progressive tax topping out at 91% means that income above a certain amount is taxed at 91%? That lower amounts of income are taxed the same as everyone else?
Just want to clarify that you aren't suggesting taking almost everything away from the rich.
Are you thinking if we take from the rich and give to the poor that there's enough to eliminate poverty? Could you please explain why we still have poverty in spite of programs that have spent, after adjusting for inflation, trillions since the 1960's?If the scourge of America is identified and removed then doesn’t America and all Americans win .
You can not raise people up by tearing others down.If the scourge of America is identified and removed then doesn’t America and all Americans win .
I agree in principle with this .You can not raise people up by tearing others down.
Terrific.I agree in principle with this .
My idea has nothing do with tearing anyone down or solving others specific problems. I simply identified what I believe to be the scourge of America and my suggested solution.Terrific.
So we're agreed that tearing the rich down won't solve the problems of the poor.
Glad we straightened that out.
I don’t agree with your premise in your OP.To all my BC Brethren,
I am firmly convinced that the scourge of American Society is the absurd accumulation of power resulting from the absurd accumulation of wealth.
IMO Both have proven to be a problem in the governance of American society.I don’t agree with your premise in your OP.
How ever one has accumulated an “absurd amount of wealth “ “absurd power “ isn’t the guaranteed result.
I still think you have it in for the wealthy.
Nothing wrong with having money. Just don’t let money have you. And, stop coveting.
Flat tax is the only fair tax.
The tax laws are too complex. Most can be eliminated with the Fair Tax.IMO Both have proven to be a problem in the governance of American society.
I have nothing against the wealthy, if I did I’d be against myself because I’m eternally rich beyond measure.
Do you oppose the current US income tax laws?
I don’t see them as too complexThe tax laws are too complex. Most can be eliminated with the Fair Tax.
Are you familiar with the Fair Tax? And do you realize why there are so many CPA's and tax attorneys in this country? Just because your personal taxes aren't complex doesn't mean that the regulatory burden put on both business owners and wealthy individuals isn't complex.I don’t see them as too complex
IMO The Fair Tax Act would exacerbate what I believe is the scourge of American society thereby causing more harm to Americans.
YesAre you familiar with the Fair Tax? And do you realize why there are so many CPA's and tax attorneys in this country? Just because your personal taxes aren't complex doesn't mean that the regulatory burden put on both business owners and wealthy individuals isn't complex.
But it's relevant to many others. Doesn't have to be the Fair Tax. Just streamline the paying of taxes for all instead of wasting billions annually just trying to comply with ever changing laws.Yes
No
Irrelevant to me.-Batman
Not to me.But it's relevant to many others. Doesn't have to be the Fair Tax. Just streamline the paying of taxes for all instead of wasting billions annually just trying to comply with ever changing laws.
Because you are wanting to create yet another level of taxation with the full intent of taking away from the wealthy. You say 91% but have yet to say what level of income would kick in the 91%. Millions? Hundreds of thousands? If a business increases in value would it be taxed at 91% or is this strictly individual income? Which would lead to individuals seeking tax professionals to find a way around it which would lead to the government taxing other assets to gain back what individuals are avoiding. And lead to wealthy individuals contributing to campaign coffers to get the result they want which leads to more burden put on the middle class.Not to me.
How is this relevant to what I believe to be the scourge of American society and the possible removal of said scourge?
I favor a 10% sales tax across the board, including for the purchase and sale of capital assets. Abolish the income tax.To all my BC Brethren,
I am firmly convinced that the scourge of American Society is the absurd accumulation of power resulting from the absurd accumulation of wealth.
In principle I am strongly in favor of a progressive income tax that de incentivizes this absurd accumulation of wealth and the resultant corrupt political power that goes along with it.
I have posted this elsewhere but I feel it need to be repeated here for possible discussion:
I have the suspicion that as long as the rich politicians and rich corporations that own them can keep the non-rich fighting the moral high ground issues for their political gain and that IMO they mostly regard from a political perspective their purposes will be furthered because the non-rich will not seek to address the real scourge of American society; the absurd accumulation of power through the absurd accumulation of wealth.
I am all for a new progressive income tax rate system that unashamedly taxes the richest of the rich up to 91% and the poorest of the poor 0%.
Disclaimer:
My idea would certainly would put me in the 0% bracket.
Sincerely,
I