Let me spell it for you E-L-E-C-T-I-O-N-S not campaigns. Your not even in my local ?!?!?! I love how you act like you know something. Now please just let it go and stop giving me your lame scenarios about 2 slates.... Your reformers lost TWICE! Get it? I'm sure in three years you will talk some poor suckers into doing it all over again. Maybe you should worry about you crew at 396 running against Ron H tuff stuff. Because around here you just look foolish.
L'brown...
Reading your posts is alot like listening to sesame street.
Its really nice to see your childish side appear while you choose to come across as a Local representative in an online forum, where not even your EO's participate.
Are you the ONLY 952 self appointed official speaking on behalf of 952?
Elections can be swayed to achieve your desired result.
How much did your elected officials depend upon the uninformed to vote to continue the same direction?
There are 2 buildings under 952's watch, correct?
How did either building vote?
Running down the supporters, without informing them of the current state of your local, would seem to present misinformation to continue the same rule of your local.
For those who voted to continue with the current staff, are they aware of the financial state of your local? Prior to voting for your agenda?
Its one thing to re-elect the prior leading officers, its quite another to re-elect those same people to continue to produce the argument realbrown1 presents with the beginning post regarding your local's financial health.
It would be really nice to hear that all the energy that you spend here defending those above you should be directly placed towards your local's health and lasting success.
Until that happens, .........