BrownBrokeDown
Well-Known Member
Yes you are correct. Innocent till proven guilty. I misspoke.What the are accused of. They will have their day in court. Correct?
Yes you are correct. Innocent till proven guilty. I misspoke.What the are accused of. They will have their day in court. Correct?
2 totally different situations and times. Listen wide, I am 100% pro-union. I believe in standing up for our rights. The picketing was standing up for our rights. What they are accused of, if true, is 100% not called for in a peaceful situation. they had noone shooting at themPeople said that about our 8 hour day. And people died over that.
Well stop being lazy and look it up.Somethings not meshing here between you too, and I'm being to lazy to look it up today.
The union wanted Bravo to give no-work jobs to Teamsters? or the teamsters wanted the jobs that are unionized by teamsters in that area worked by teamsters?
I agree. My only complaint is people are ready to hang other without 1) knowing the facts and 2) not waiting for their day in court.2 totally different situations and times. Listen wide, I am 100% pro-union. I believe in standing up for our rights. The picketing was standing up for our rights. What they are accused of, if true, is 100% not called for in a peaceful situation. they had noone shooting at them
Lol, any other day I would real, you should know that by now. However, as we all know, just because its on the web means its true, right?Well stop being lazy and look it up.
You don't want to rely on wide or lead for any information if you don't have to.
That I can agree with.I agree. My only complaint is people are ready to hang other without 1) knowing the facts and 2) not waiting for their day in court.
How about if it's in the Boston Globe?Lol, any other day I would real, you should know that by now. However, as we all know, just because its on the web means its true, right?
Lol. 1st of all I didn't say it didn't happen, but 2nd of all, let it work out in the courts so we hopefully know the full truth, btw 3rd of all, all newspapers have sections where they issue retractions, and 4th of all, the police can arrest people based on charges that get disproved in courtHow about if it's in the Boston Globe?
I agree. My only complaint is people are ready to hang other without 1) knowing the facts and 2) not waiting for their day in court.
Why are you speaking for all? Second, state your proof. Third, I hardly thing some verbal cat calls constitutes a physical altercation as you just described.This isn't even the first time that Local 25 thugs have tried to muscle a woman!
Oh, I am so sorry.Lol. 1st of all I didn't say it didn't happen, but 2nd of all, let it work out in the courts so we hopefully know the full truth, btw 3rd of all, all newspapers have sections where they issue retractions, and 4th of all, the police can arrest people based on charges that get disproved in court
It appears they criticize others for doing the same thing they are doing.Oh, I am so sorry.
I thought we were going with what wide and lead consider guilty until proven innocent as the have done with T.S. and the United slate.
Haven't they found T.S. guilty after an audio tape was presented?
I guess some people are just 2 faced.
And SOME PEOPLE pretend to be impartial, when they are really on wide and lead's side.
I don't believe I am wide or lead, and I also believe I have disagreed with what they are doing as well. I even believe that I have had a few posts recently that reflected that. Also how is an article in a newspaper the same as an audio tape? anyway, maybe you should focus on the person you are replying to rather than letting your anger boil over on anyone that maybe replying to a thread you are in. I had asked a simple question, don't be an ass.Oh, I am so sorry.
I thought we were going with what wide and lead consider guilty until proven innocent as the have done with T.S. and the United slate.
Haven't they found T.S. guilty after an audio tape was presented?
I guess some people are just 2 faced.
And SOME PEOPLE pretend to be impartial, when they are really on wide and lead's side.
Or otherwise........what?Thought I would add too, I don't give a rat's behind about what TS feel's about the Union members as long as I would benefit from his Teamster presidency if he's elected. However I am still waiting on him to announce plans other than work harder, try harder, fight harder. I need specifics not generalizations which he still hasn't said.
Tim=H = H
hall = hall
try Whorefa
or hopha
or Hahfah
etc.
Just when you read but then you are special.Tim=
Not impressedJust when you read but then you are special.