UPS Wrongly fired Driver for Union Activities but stays fired due to Facebook postings

Mugarolla

Light 'em up!
If federal law over rules anything a contract or supplement says where does free speech come in?

Free speech comes in where the law allows it.

Free speech is in the master document of the United States law, the Constitution. You are allowed to have an opinion and vocally express it.

Yes you are. But did you read his posts?

There are types of speech that are not protected by the First Amendment. Free speech does not guarantee you the right to say anything you want. It also only protects you from prosecution from the government.

The following types of speech are not protected under the First Amendment.

Obscenity
Fighting words
Defamation (includes libel, slander)
Child pornography
Perjury
Blackmail
Incitement to imminent lawless action
True threats
Solicitations to commit crimes

The Administrative Law Judge agreed with UPS, that if he had still been an employee, he would have been terminated immediately for making those remarks under the UPS Anti-Harassment Policy.

If I can't call management team out for something they have done then how do we keep them honest?

You can call them out, you just cannot harass, coerce, intimidate, demean, defame, etc.

If he had just stuck to posting about his unjust termination, and not included the "extra's," he would be back to work today.

Now tact and professionalism is preferred in these situations, which apparently this guy did not have

Exactly. Not only that, what he posted may have been illegal under the law.

My main concern is what happens when the supervisor really is knuckle dragging and its true?

Really? Anyway, he said a little more than that. If he had just stuck to knuckle dragger, he may have been reinstated.

this knuckle dragger is the Division Manager who [buffoons] his way along trying to
do his master (name withheld) bidding . . . he’s a cross between Barney Rubble,
Shrek, and Captain Caveman . . . listening to him talk is actually quite humorous,
it sounds like he’s chewing on cotton balls and marbles . . . I’ve yet to hear him
ever say one intelligent thing, but then again, it’d be difficult to decipher it if he did.

(name withheld) . . . this piece of garbage is the District Labor manager that has insinuate
himself into every step of my discipline . . . a condescending, self righteous little man
who’s creepy demean[or] will just plain make your skin crawl . . . I have to say I have
never seen a man sit in a chair and cross his legs in a more dainty and effeminate way, he
legitimately looks like he should be sitting on a tuffet eating his curds and whey! . . . he
definitely gives off the impression that he’s trying as hard as he can to compensate for
something. . . . my guess, erectile dysfunction.

This guy can not violate any UPS policies if he was fired by anything he said. After termination he was no longer legally bound to any agreements either verbal, written, expressed, or implied.

That is my issue also. The ALJ did not reinstate him because he said that UPS would have terminated the guy for making those comments. But the guy was not an employee at the time he made them. Or was he?

Now if these were the type of comments he was making before termination then my whole argument falls apart and he should have been smarter.

I agree. I was looking for, and still cannot find, a precedent or case to not reinstate an employee because of post employment actions.

The closest I found so far is a board decision denying back pay to an individual, who was reinstated, during the time he was arrested and incarcerated.

Also I agree with almost your entire argument throughout this thread. I just see a particular legal separation between employed date and the minute he was terminated.

The only issue that I can come up with so far is that if this guy appealed his termination to the NLRB, which is basically what he did, that he is not "legally" terminated until the decision from the NLRB.

I don't know. I am not a lawyer. If the ALJ made this decision erroneously, I'm sure it will be reversed upon appeal, if it is appealed.

Again the argument he shouldn't have said any of this if he wanted his job back does stand under common sense and common courtesy, but the legal definition is just not there because he was no longer bound by any policies after termination legally.

Maybe there is something in the law that we are not seeing about termination and when he is "legally" terminated. He did have his termination appealed to the NLRB. Is he not officially terminated, under the law, until the NLRB rules either way? Again I am not a lawyer.

If it appealed, we may find out.

Doesn't management harrass us every day?

Maybe not every day, but if they do it verbally like this guy did, to the extent that this guy did, and they admit to it or you have witnesses, they too will be terminated.

I held the door open for a Center Manager myself. Watched him walk right out the door never to come back again.

So if that was the case all of us would be fired because EVERYONE including management has said something in here that has had a negative slant towards the company....

A negatively slanted comment is far from inflammatory, degrading, harassment, etc.

You have to say far more than my sup is a jerk to be terminated under the Anti-Harassment Policy.

That's different....double standar

Kind of. They will protect their own accused of harassment to the end. They will do everything they can to make the charge go away so they do not have to deal with it. If you have witnesses, and push the issue, and it is credible, even a Center Manager will be walked out the door.

Hence, why he gets zero back pay.

I thought he got back pay up until the point where UPS learned about his Facebook posts. This is where the ALJ stopped the back pay, agreeing that at this point, UPS would have terminated him.

Where does the contract specify what a cardinal sin is?

In your Supplement. Most are different. Some list workplace violence as a cardinal sin, some do not.

But, if your going where I think you are going, I believe that no supplement specifically lists Harassment as a Cardinal Sin. Does not matter though. You will be terminated for harassment anyway, Cardinal Sin or not.

I don't see how an employee can be disciplined when he's not on the clock. Which is essentially what they did in this case.

An employee, posting inflammatory, derogatory, intimidating, etc. remarks about his employer or sup, in a public forum or chat room, etc. will be terminated, by any company, whether off the clock or not.

Read the newspaper. It happens everyday.

Just because you are off the clock does not mean that you are legally allowed to harass, coerce, intimidate, demean, defame, your supervisor on social media.

Like I said before, calling your boss a jerk on Facebook will not get you fired. Doing what the guy in question did, no question. You will be terminated.

Hindsight always 20/20.

Kind of.

But, I have over 2500 posts on this site. Have you seen one post where I have harasses, intimidated, coerced, anyone?

Believe me, I'd like to. Been here over 30 years. I could write a book and over half of it would be negative about UPS and its managers. I have seen it all, done it all, been through it all.

And UPS does not even know who I am. This guy posted under his own name to Facebook.

He was fired and then posted the comments.

One of the issues I see from this case. I wish the ALJ would have cited his legal evidence, or case law, or decision which he based his decision upon.

We can only hope for an appeal.
 

10 point

Well-Known Member
The NLRB has its own rendition of Workplace Harassment and hostility definitions.
None of which are applied to management transgressions until there's no alternative from what we've seen.
The workplace is quicksand for bargaining unit members in this arena and an elevator for The Other Side.
 

Inthegame

Well-Known Member
Free speech comes in where the law allows it.



Yes you are. But did you read his posts?

There are types of speech that are not protected by the First Amendment. Free speech does not guarantee you the right to say anything you want. It also only protects you from prosecution from the government.

The following types of speech are not protected under the First Amendment.

Obscenity
Fighting words
Defamation (includes libel, slander)
Child pornography
Perjury
Blackmail
Incitement to imminent lawless action
True threats
Solicitations to commit crimes

The Administrative Law Judge agreed with UPS, that if he had still been an employee, he would have been terminated immediately for making those remarks under the UPS Anti-Harassment Policy.



You can call them out, you just cannot harass, coerce, intimidate, demean, defame, etc.

If he had just stuck to posting about his unjust termination, and not included the "extra's," he would be back to work today.



Exactly. Not only that, what he posted may have been illegal under the law.



Really? Anyway, he said a little more than that. If he had just stuck to knuckle dragger, he may have been reinstated.

this knuckle dragger is the Division Manager who [buffoons] his way along trying to
do his master (name withheld) bidding . . . he’s a cross between Barney Rubble,
Shrek, and Captain Caveman . . . listening to him talk is actually quite humorous,
it sounds like he’s chewing on cotton balls and marbles . . . I’ve yet to hear him
ever say one intelligent thing, but then again, it’d be difficult to decipher it if he did.

(name withheld) . . . this piece of garbage is the District Labor manager that has insinuate
himself into every step of my discipline . . . a condescending, self righteous little man
who’s creepy demean[or] will just plain make your skin crawl . . . I have to say I have
never seen a man sit in a chair and cross his legs in a more dainty and effeminate way, he
legitimately looks like he should be sitting on a tuffet eating his curds and whey! . . . he
definitely gives off the impression that he’s trying as hard as he can to compensate for
something. . . . my guess, erectile dysfunction.



That is my issue also. The ALJ did not reinstate him because he said that UPS would have terminated the guy for making those comments. But the guy was not an employee at the time he made them. Or was he?



I agree. I was looking for, and still cannot find, a precedent or case to not reinstate an employee because of post employment actions.

The closest I found so far is a board decision denying back pay to an individual, who was reinstated, during the time he was arrested and incarcerated.



The only issue that I can come up with so far is that if this guy appealed his termination to the NLRB, which is basically what he did, that he is not "legally" terminated until the decision from the NLRB.

I don't know. I am not a lawyer. If the ALJ made this decision erroneously, I'm sure it will be reversed upon appeal, if it is appealed.



Maybe there is something in the law that we are not seeing about termination and when he is "legally" terminated. He did have his termination appealed to the NLRB. Is he not officially terminated, under the law, until the NLRB rules either way? Again I am not a lawyer.

If it appealed, we may find out.



Maybe not every day, but if they do it verbally like this guy did, to the extent that this guy did, and they admit to it or you have witnesses, they too will be terminated.

I held the door open for a Center Manager myself. Watched him walk right out the door never to come back again.



A negatively slanted comment is far from inflammatory, degrading, harassment, etc.

You have to say far more than my sup is a jerk to be terminated under the Anti-Harassment Policy.



Kind of. They will protect their own accused of harassment to the end. They will do everything they can to make the charge go away so they do not have to deal with it. If you have witnesses, and push the issue, and it is credible, even a Center Manager will be walked out the door.



I thought he got back pay up until the point where UPS learned about his Facebook posts. This is where the ALJ stopped the back pay, agreeing that at this point, UPS would have terminated him.



In your Supplement. Most are different. Some list workplace violence as a cardinal sin, some do not.

But, if your going where I think you are going, I believe that no supplement specifically lists Harassment as a Cardinal Sin. Does not matter though. You will be terminated for harassment anyway, Cardinal Sin or not.



An employee, posting inflammatory, derogatory, intimidating, etc. remarks about his employer or sup, in a public forum or chat room, etc. will be terminated, by any company, whether off the clock or not.

Read the newspaper. It happens everyday.

Just because you are off the clock does not mean that you are legally allowed to harass, coerce, intimidate, demean, defame, your supervisor on social media.

Like I said before, calling your boss a jerk on Facebook will not get you fired. Doing what the guy in question did, no question. You will be terminated.



Kind of.

But, I have over 2500 posts on this site. Have you seen one post where I have harasses, intimidated, coerced, anyone?

Believe me, I'd like to. Been here over 30 years. I could write a book and over half of it would be negative about UPS and its managers. I have seen it all, done it all, been through it all.

And UPS does not even know who I am. This guy posted under his own name to Facebook.



One of the issues I see from this case. I wish the ALJ would have cited his legal evidence, or case law, or decision which he based his decision upon.

We can only hope for an appeal.
Another good analysis of this case.

I believe the ALJ got a little too cute with the ruling and denied the employee his contractual rights.

By treating the ex-employee as if he were an active employee subject to company policies, the ALJ ruled (with prejudiced certainty) that he would have been fired. But by making that ruling after the fact the ALJ denied the party their rights to grieve THAT termination.

Presumably the NLRB is the body that protects both sides fairly in the process. RA was hardly treated fairly if he lost his right to grieve a termination.
 

Inthegame

Well-Known Member
The NLRB has its own rendition of Workplace Harassment and hostility definitions.
None of which are applied to management transgressions until there's no alternative from what we've seen.
The workplace is quicksand for bargaining unit members in this arena and an elevator for The Other Side.
The crafting of that last sentence would make Rod Serling proud...
 

10 point

Well-Known Member
The crafting of that last sentence would make Rod Serling proud...
I had to sleep with the closet light on in those days (of grammar school) since my parents let us watch the Outer Limits.

Funny, I actually thought about that earlier today.
Probably since it is peak.:scared:
 

clean hairy

Well-Known Member
We only know what we have been told here.
There could be even more to this which has not been made public.
What we do know is a former employee was hoping to be reinstated at some point. In that case he would have done best to stay off social media. At the most to just mention being terminated and update when a final resolution is reached.
The company could have presented how unhappy he is, and it could be cause for concern if he was to be reinstated based on his social media posts.
We never will know, just speculating here.
 

10 point

Well-Known Member
We only know what we have been told here.
There could be even more to this which has not been made public.
What we do know is a former employee was hoping to be reinstated at some point. In that case he would have done best to stay off social media. At the most to just mention being terminated and update when a final resolution is reached.
The company could have presented how unhappy he is, and it could be cause for concern if he was to be reinstated based on his social media posts.
We never will know, just speculating here.
No matter what happens it looks like this driver got screwed from both sides and has tenaciously fought it farther than most have the backbone to have especially after getting offered a settlement to clam up and go away.

Few have walked in his shoes.
 

Catatonic

Nine Lives
No matter what happens it looks like this driver got screwed from both sides and has tenaciously fought it farther than most have the backbone to have especially after getting offered a settlement to clam up and go away.

Few have walked in his shoes.
Three sides, @10 point!


 
Last edited:

Coldworld

Well-Known Member
No matter what happens it looks like this driver got screwed from both sides and has tenaciously fought it farther than most have the backbone to have especially after getting offered a settlement to clam up and go away.

Few have walked in his shoes.
So what would happen to his pension if he did take a settlement???
 

Overpaid Union Thug

Well-Known Member
Another good analysis of this case.

I believe the ALJ got a little too cute with the ruling and denied the employee his contractual rights.

By treating the ex-employee as if he were an active employee subject to company policies, the ALJ ruled (with prejudiced certainty) that he would have been fired. But by making that ruling after the fact the ALJ denied the party their rights to grieve THAT termination.

Presumably the NLRB is the body that protects both sides fairly in the process. RA was hardly treated fairly if he lost his right to grieve a termination.
Exactly! I've seen people get fired for much worse than what this guy said but each and every one returned to work swiftly. Why? Bscause it's not a cardinal sin (at least in my supplement) to verbally let off steam. The judge said that UPS WOULD HAVE fired the guy for his comments. Ok...fine.....but in that case the guy WOULD HAVE had the opportunity to grieve it and likely be reinstated.

The whole ordeal reaks of corruption on the union's part and it's obvious the judge's decision was erroneous. I dont know the monetary cost of an appeal but it might very well be worth it.
 

stray

Well-Known Member
anyone have a link where one can read the ruling without subscribing to a 3rd party site? BRF is on my joint council and i can't believe she hasn't been removed yet...
 
Top