catstalking
ie qt
republicans can be globalists too, your particular flavor of what you think is a republicans doesn't match the reality of who sits in DCYou are describing liberals and globalists. I said republicans
republicans can be globalists too, your particular flavor of what you think is a republicans doesn't match the reality of who sits in DCYou are describing liberals and globalists. I said republicans
okay, you can come up with all the legit and loony programs the government spends money on, they still don't come anywhere close to weapons and welfareAnd that’s just one small example
And ironically, both of those things, weapons and welfare, are meant to keep the population where they want them, and push their agenda further. It creates power, and expands the wealth of the already wealthy, and that’s a powerful aphrodisiac for politicians.okay, you can come up with all the legit and loony programs the government spends money on, they still don't come anywhere close to weapons and welfare
You got the part time ball washer voteLol “non-liberal”. . You’re a government whore.
You got the part time ball washer vote
I don't think you understand. There wouldn't need to be taxes because you're paying to use the road directly instead.Sure and it will be triple the cost of your taxes
>he thinks taxes are used to pay for thingsSure and it will be triple the cost of your taxes
Yet… noe response. I didn’t really expect anything else.
No it’s just privatization is only for profit. Which is fine except when it comes to roads and infrastructure. You’re better off paying for that through taxation. Same reason why teachers and government employees should have never been allowed to unionize.
Teachers deserve more pay. I imagine no unions would only hurt them. Also I can’t imagine police would be happy losing unionsNo it’s just privatization is only for profit. Which is fine except when it comes to roads and infrastructure. You’re better off paying for that through taxation. Same reason why teachers and government employees should have never been allowed to unionize.
Plenty of examples show that’s not a good idea. Lol
Sure.Plenty of examples show that’s not a good idea. Lol
No response? you were schooled like a little high school girl. You are not a conservative nor constitutionalist. You are a big government, loving Republican not much different than a democrat. Congratulations.Yet… noe response. I didn’t really expect anything else.
Notice I didn’t say democrats and republicans.republicans can be globalists too, your particular flavor of what you think is a republicans doesn't match the reality of who sits in DC
I know he sits in Mara-lagorepublicans can be globalists too, your particular flavor of what you think is a republicans doesn't match the reality of who sits in DC
Under house arrest?I know he sits in Mara-lago
schooled? In which way?!? you are hillarious and odd.No response? you were schooled like a little high school girl. You are not a conservative nor constitutionalist. You are a big government, loving Republican not much different than a democrat. Congratulations.
Well the crooked DOJ tried that but surprise! They failed at that too, lolUnder house arrest?
By taxation and no unions allowed.Teachers deserve more pay. I imagine no unions would only hurt them. Also I can’t imagine police would be happy losing unions
To defend your point however, to the people advocating for zero taxes, how do you propose we pay for police and firefighters? And our military?