I know a lot of judgments that were made that weren't right. Depends on what judge it was and what way they slanted. Doesn't make it true.
It's gov't approved and enforced discrimination against white males. To use weasel-words and progressive sounding phrases to justify it's existence (or to deny it exists) is an exercise in semantics.
Wasn't so long ago there were laws on the books in this nation that specifically discriminated towards black people. And Native-Americans. And Japanese, etc. At one time, the Irish (some of the whitest people on Earth) in America were discriminated against. By guess who? White people!
Like Jim Crow laws, affirmative action laws will one day be a thing of the past. It would be interesting to see how much history will be revised (if much at all) in order to explain and look back on this time period. Because the victors ALWAYS write the history books.
Every identifiable group in this nation has or will get a ride on the 'victim of injustice merry-go-round.' Right now, it's whitey's turn. And this too, will pass.
Kind of like this one story at UPS where a male driver had a female helper they were being paid the same but he was having to do more of the work, because she obviously couldn't lift as much. He complained and said he wasn't going to do it anymore so he got fired. They kept her and what did they do? Replaced him with another man that again had to do more work for same pay lol.
Every delivery company I've worked for has been like this. Men are always lifting the heavy stuff for women. Heavy packages are diverted to routes that men are on, and women get the light stuff.
And it's exactly that way where I work now. The tired feminist mantra of "equal work for equal pay", (among many others) seems very silly when one observes the division of work between the sexes in the package delivery industry.