Why can’t Trump condemn “Super Duper Radical Neo-Nazi White Transphobic Terrorism Against Puppies?"

floridays

Well-Known Member
Wrong. Because global policies for the most part heavily favor the US. It’s almost like we wrote them.
Just admit what you just wrote is unfounded
bsbullf.gif
and we can let this post die a quiet death.
 

Old Man Jingles

Rat out of a cage
you could easily make an argument for his being a black one with his devisive race tactics.
Sorry but I cannot in anyway perceive or deduce that Obama is a Nationalist.
Definitely a Black Supremacist but in no way a Nationalist.
He positioned the USA in a much weaker situation after every agreement he signed.
 

Fenris

Well-Known Member
you have significant trade imbalances everywhere , how did he possibly negotiate anything that was favorable to the US.

Not sticking up for Obama as he didn't negotiate most of the deals but trade imbalances are not bad for the typi american. They are good for the consumers. The fifties are over and we are moving from manufacturing to information and protectionism may temporarily aid a very small set of people but harms everyone in the long term.
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
Not sticking up for Obama as he didn't negotiate most of the deals but trade imbalances are not bad for the typi american. They are good for the consumers. The fifties are over and we are moving from manufacturing to information and protectionism may temporarily aid a very small set of people but harms everyone in the long term.

I'm fine with that if our trade partner is not doing anything such as currency devaluation or tariffs to influence the trade deficit.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
Not sticking up for Obama as he didn't negotiate most of the deals but trade imbalances are not bad for the typi american. They are good for the consumers. The fifties are over and we are moving from manufacturing to information and protectionism may temporarily aid a very small set of people but harms everyone in the long term.
Information jobs make good paying jobs fewer and fewer. As long as that happens you're going to see politicians appeal to the large group of voters that were left behind. Worked for Trump, will work for future politicians. Service jobs only pay so much, creates a large underclass that fuels anger and makes it possible for ideas like socialism to flourish.
 

oldngray

nowhere special
Information jobs make good paying jobs fewer and fewer. As long as that happens you're going to see politicians appeal to the large group of voters that were left behind. Worked for Trump, will work for future politicians. Service jobs only pay so much, creates a large underclass that fuels anger and makes it possible for ideas like socialism to flourish.
Those information jobs are easily outsourced to India. Not something I would plan my life around.

And service jobs are only good as long as there are enough other productive jobs to pay for them.
 

floridays

Well-Known Member
Exactly ... there is no way Obama supported American interests and primarily because he is a globalist.


An offering, obviously edited, is a starting point or view to this candidates philosophy.
We live the effects of his philosophy and policies to this day.

The left forges on, leftward as their candidate will have to feign moderation to be elected as Obama did later in his campaign.

They are globalists, as Obama and way to many elected repubics. Globalists for different reasons, globalists nonetheless.

I love my country, America first.

If that makes me a bad person, I'll wear it well. If that makes me a racist under some convoluted definition, so be it, I'll wear it well.

I'm a citizen of The United States of America.

I have no global citizenship, I simply live on the same planet, no more no less.
 
Top