As Christians we are to put God's law before man's. So it really depends on the board's final decision.I would say politely and peacefully state their questions and objections followed by respectfully accepting the final decision of the board.
As Christians we are to put God's law before man's. So it really depends on the board's final decision.I would say politely and peacefully state their questions and objections followed by respectfully accepting the final decision of the board.
He is a moral relativist.As Christians we are to put God's law before man's. So it really depends on the board's final decision.
That’s what makes him so dangerous.He is a moral relativist.
A lot of people have been tricked into thinking that tolerance of sin crap is Christian. It's not.
It's a huge problem with Christianity today.That’s what makes him so dangerous.
Cynic? Each bloated school district has it own highly paid superintendent and administrative staff. They could easily combine districts saving millions annually.Always the cynic.
How so?As Christians we are to put God's law before man's. So it really depends on the board's final decision.
As is every person.He is a moral relativist.
A lot of people have been tricked into thinking that tolerance of sin crap is Christian. It's not.
No it isn't.As is every person.
Loving all is.
IMO Absolutist thinking is more of a problem.It's a huge problem with Christianity today.
According to my experience and observations it is. Sorry.No it isn't.
I was referencing @UnionStrong’s reply.Cynic? Each bloated school district has it own highly paid superintendent and administrative staff. They could easily combine districts saving millions annually.
I think you are overstating my impact on anyone.That’s what makes him so dangerous.
You reject the word of God.IMO Absolutist thinking is more of a problem.
Pharisees were kinda moral know it alls.
I would think that's obvious. If a school board votes to put graphic sexual content into school libraries, as a Christian I think that not only should be argued against, protested, but also to work towards getting the board members who voted for it booted.How so?
people have been tricked into thinking that tolerance of sin crap is Christian. It's not.
Loving all is.
No it isn't.
Tolerance of sin is not love.According to my experience and observations it is. Sorry.
By this comment I do not reject the word of God any more than you do.You reject the word of God.
That's your problem.
Seems like a reasonable and respectful way to handle dissent of any school board decision.I would think that's obvious. If a school board votes to put graphic sexual content into school libraries, as a Christian I think that not only should be argued against, protested, but also to work towards getting the board members who voted for it booted.
IMO intolerance of sin is not love.Tolerance of sin is not love.
It is the opposite of love.
We aren't Hamas.Seems like a reasonable and respectful way to handle dissent of any school board decision.
What does Hamas have to do with local school boards?We aren't Hamas.