So where did it say he was angry?You think you're angry? I got the xeroxed letter from Ken H today admonishing me for voting no. He's clearly angry that he can't get back to his golf game because of people like me.
So where did it say he was angry?You think you're angry? I got the xeroxed letter from Ken H today admonishing me for voting no. He's clearly angry that he can't get back to his golf game because of people like me.
What did he really say?"Unfortunately for those of you who voted Yes, the others who voted No screwed you...."You think you're angry? I got the xeroxed letter from Ken H today admonishing me for voting no. He's clearly angry that he can't get back to his golf game because of people like me.
Loosely quoted, but that's what he's saying.
So where did it say he was angry?
What did he really say?
Omg!!! How dear he!!! That is deplorable!!! I can't believe he would inform us with the answers of the exact same questions that stewards field everyday. This is sickening! Damn this union!! NO! NO!!!! NOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!
But in all seriousness, I can't believe that some fools take everything as a personal attack. If the guy worded it another way, some would say it was a "brown out". People make me laugh man.
"Unfortunately, for those of you who voted to ratify both the National Agreement and your Supplement, you will have to wait for the members in the rest of the country to approve their Supplements before you can receive your wage increases, benefits, and language improvements contained in the new National Agreement and your new Supplement".
Ken H
Who else can't quite understand why our wonderful union has allowed us to keep working instead of putting pressure on UPS to get the contract finished? Instead of striking, we get to keep working under the same ****ty working conditions, the same 95 language that means nothing to UPS, and keep getting all the harassment for doing this job. There are drivers out in my building until 10pm tonight. This ISN'T peak. What the hell. From what our supervisors said, it came down from corporate that routes need to be cut and stops per car way up. Is this what we have to look forward to for the next 5 years?
You sound like you might be a bit pissed off!
I always find contract time an interesting exercise. You can tell who has been around through a number of these and who hasn't!
Think I'll pour another glass of cold sweet tea and enjoy the savor of 9 in a row!
WOW! I didn't think you commented outside of the "Current Events" forum. Or maybe I have just missed some.
The above wasn't in the letter that I received yesterday."Unfortunately, for those of you who voted to ratify both the National Agreement and your Supplement, you will have to wait for the members in the rest of the country to approve their Supplements before you can receive your wage increases, benefits, and language improvements contained in the new National Agreement and your new Supplement".
Ken H
"Unfortunately, for those of you who voted to ratify both the National Agreement and your Supplement, you will have to wait for the members in the rest of the country to approve their Supplements before you can receive your wage increases, benefits, and language improvements contained in the new National Agreement and your new Supplement".
Ken H
No, people who project their own feelings onto the words of the paper see a personal attack. Look I voted no, but even I only read that he was informing the people who voted yes that they have to wait till it's all ratified. Do schools not teach context anymore? You take a paragraph and read into it what you think/feel? That's really too bad. Take the whole letter into account, not just a paragraph.It is a personal attack. People who can read between the lines noticed it immediately.