Abortion

[bottomups]

Federal government can kiss my rear end. I made a donation to Planned Parenthood this year.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

This is going ...

View attachment 195790

Let the hatred flow!

 

[Serf]

They’re celebrating gaining freedom from an oppressive government policy.

hour ferry ride to England and you can have yourself pick of the litter in Abortion Services. Meanwhile Government won't let women Swim in a pool in Riyadh or try on clothes when shopping.

 

[It will be fine]

hour ferry ride to England and you can have yourself pick of the litter in Abortion Services. Meanwhile Government won't let women Swim in a pool in Riyadh or try on clothes when shopping.

Cool story. Good illustration of the perils of allowing religion to dictate governmental policy.

 

[tonyexpress]

Cool story. Good illustration of the perils of allowing religion to dictate governmental policy.

Oh well... Then there's this just today.

U.S. Supreme Court backs Christian baker who spurned gay couple

Two of the court's four liberals, Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan, joined the five conservative justices in the ruling authored by Justice Anthony Kennedy, who also was the author of the landmark 2015 decision legalizing gay marriage nationwide.

 

[oldngray]

Oh well... Then there's this just today.

U.S. Supreme Court backs Christian baker who spurned gay couple

Two of the court's four liberals, Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan, joined the five conservative justices in the ruling authored by Justice Anthony Kennedy, who also was the author of the landmark 2015 decision legalizing gay marriage nationwide.

The Supremes also did this.

Supreme Court wipes away lower court ruling that granted undocumented teen access to abortion

 

[It will be fine]

Oh well... Then there's this just today.

U.S. Supreme Court backs Christian baker who spurned gay couple

Two of the court's four liberals, Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan, joined the five conservative justices in the ruling authored by Justice Anthony Kennedy, who also was the author of the landmark 2015 decision legalizing gay marriage nationwide.

Not sure if you intended this as a counterpoint. It’s 2 sides of the same coin.

"The commission's hostility was inconsistent with the First Amendment's guarantee that our laws be applied in a manner that is neutral toward religion," Kennedy wrote.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

Federal government can kiss my rear end. I made a donation to Planned Parenthood this year.

Great!
That’s the way it should work anyway.

 

[Sportello]

Oh well... Then there's this just today.

U.S. Supreme Court backs Christian baker who spurned gay couple

Two of the court's four liberals, Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan, joined the five conservative justices in the ruling authored by Justice Anthony Kennedy, who also was the author of the landmark 2015 decision legalizing gay marriage nationwide.

Proper headline:

Supreme Court Ruling Ducks Conflict Between Religious, Gay Rights

 

[cachmeifucan]

Wait until Kennedy and ginsberg retire . What Really happened to scalia rip.

 

[cachmeifucan]

Seems like even the supreme Court is avoiding ruling on major issues. I forgot how the choose what cases to hear each year.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

Oh well... Then there's this just today.

U.S. Supreme Court backs Christian baker who spurned gay couple

Two of the court's four liberals, Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan, joined the five conservative justices in the ruling authored by Justice Anthony Kennedy, who also was the author of the landmark 2015 decision legalizing gay marriage nationwide.

Proper headline:

Supreme Court Ruling Ducks Conflict Between Religious, Gay Rights

Yep.
This ruling couldn't have been more narrowly written.
It doesn't address the issues surrounding the case.
Mainly address this case specifically and the overreach of the government against religion based decisions of a specific individual.

If the total case is ever heard by the SCOTUS, the decision could be 180° in direction.

 

[tonyexpress]

Yep.
This ruling couldn't have been more narrowly written.
It doesn't address the issues surrounding the case.
Mainly address this case specifically and the overreach of the government against religion based decisions of a specific individual.

If the total case is ever heard by the SCOTUS, the decision could be 180° in direction.

That overreach didn't keep two liberal judges from seeing the light. lol

 

[Old Man Jingles]

That overreach didn't keep two liberal judges from seeing the light. lol

This ruling was about government not respecting the constitutionally specified limitations on religious persecution.

 

[bottomups]

Great!
That’s the way it should work anyway.

Yuuup. Tax deductible donation. Less cash I have to send the IRS.

 

[Serf]

Cool story. Good illustration of the perils of allowing religion to dictate governmental policy.

Think you missed what I was saying. In countries with oppressive governments you can't do certain things and you cannot leave to do those certain things and return. That is truly oppressive. Libs have always lost it when it comes to separation of Church & State.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

You support abortion, right? Many on the far Left fully support the right to terminate right up to the point of birth. Please tell how that's not worse than holding a child for a few hours while their parent sees a judge?

You seemed confused about where you are by posting this in the other thread.

Hope this helps.

 

[Indecisi0n]

My buddy is having an abortion party this weekend. What kind of gift do I bring?

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

My buddy is having an abortion party this weekend. What kind of gift do I bring?

Coat hangers?

 

[Indecisi0n]

Coat hangers?

Do I go wire or wood?