newfie
Well-Known Member
I'm still waiting for you to answer my question,
"When did your (DIDO) life begin and can we abort you?".
Take your time.
catch the wiggly worm
I'm still waiting for you to answer my question,
"When did your (DIDO) life begin and can we abort you?".
Take your time.
To be exact life begins when sperm unites with egg. As to whether one can ethically terminate it at that point is debatable. Personally I have no problem with a morning after pill, especially applied to rape and incest victims. I do have a problem with those who engage in sex for pleasure outside the bonds of marriage, then terminate the result of irresponsible behavior as if it were just a mole to be removed. But no matter my opinion I'm certain you'll disagree and find fault. I can count on that as surely as the sunrise.You come on here and rant about abortion like some nutcase, but can't even say when life begins. What a .
So you support abortion.To be exact life begins when sperm unites with egg. As to whether one can ethically terminate it at that point is debatable. Personally I have no problem with a morning after pill, especially applied to rape and incest victims. I do have a problem with those who engage in sex for pleasure outside the bonds of marriage, then terminate the result of irresponsible behavior as if it were just a mole to be removed. But no matter my opinion I'm certain you'll disagree and find fault. I can count on that as surely as the sunrise.
So basically any argument against what you believe is just ranting by nutcases?You come on here and rant about abortion like some nutcase, but can't even say when life begins. What a .
See what I mean?So you support abortion.
Cool.
You're going to hell now.
You randomly bring up abortion all the time. To insert that into an immigration debate is just bizarre.So basically any argument against what you believe is just ranting by nutcases?
Well you ranted about the sanctity of life, said life begins at conception, then said you support the morning after pill.See what I mean?
You can't argue how much you care about children, throw Christianity into the debate when you don't even believe, then not be hypocritical about your support of abortion. I guess you don't want me to bring up issues that make you look like a hypocrite. Hypocrite.You randomly bring up abortion all the time. To insert that into an immigration debate is just bizarre.
Ya, you sound like a nutcase when you do that.
I never argued I cared about children.You can't argue how much you care about children, throw Christianity into the debate when you don't even believe, then not be hypocritical about your support of abortion. I guess you don't want me to bring up issues that make you look like a hypocrite. Hypocrite.
That’s an idiotic conclusion to draw for obvious reasons. The point is I don’t believe the state should impose my morality on the populace.and thus animals who consume animals are immoral.
why is it the religion haters always try to define morality
I'm not willing to doubly punish a rape or incest victim by insisting they carry a child to term if they are impregnated. Others may feel different and I respect their view. And I'm also not God and don't pretend to be. It's a very difficult choice. But it's also a very different choice than someone who realizes after getting pregnant that having a baby is more responsibility than they want to deal with and decide to get rid of it. That's no different to me than someone paying someone to off their spouse because they don't want to be with them anymore but divorce is going to hurt them financially.Well you ranted about the sanctity of life, said life begins at conception, then said you support the morning after pill.
You seem confused lol.
I'm speaking generically. Everything is all about you, huh?I never argued I cared about children.
I never brought up Christianity.
I don't support abortion.
You're such a .
Kek.
But the state is imposing your morality. Now if the state reversed itself you'd be screaming.That’s an idiotic conclusion to draw for obvious reasons. The point is I don’t believe the state should impose my morality on the populace.
That’s how this all started. Conservatives make everything about abortion.Take the abortion topic to the abortion thread.
The state allowing personal choice is not an imposition.But the state is imposing your morality. Now if the state reversed itself you'd be screaming.
Sure you do, you just don't have the guts to say it.That’s an idiotic conclusion to draw for obvious reasons. The point is I don’t believe the state should impose my morality on the populace.
As long as the state allows personal choice on something you believe in it's fine. If you don't agree you think the state has the duty to impose rules and regulations, choice be damned.The state allowing personal choice is not an imposition.
How did that sperm swim to the egg if it wasn't alive?To be exact life begins when sperm unites with egg. As to whether one can ethically terminate it at that point is debatable. Personally I have no problem with a morning after pill, especially applied to rape and incest victims. I do have a problem with those who engage in sex for pleasure outside the bonds of marriage, then terminate the result of irresponsible behavior as if it were just a mole to be removed. But no matter my opinion I'm certain you'll disagree and find fault. I can count on that as surely as the sunrise.
You can't argue how much you care about children, throw Christianity into the debate when you don't even believe, then not be hypocritical about your support of abortion. I guess you don't want me to bring up issues that make you look like a hypocrite. Hypocrite.
Holy cow man, aren't you tired from constantly moving the goal posts around?I'm speaking generically. Everything is all about you, huh?
If you're going to use that logic then every time you ejaculate you're committing mass murder.How did that sperm swim to the egg if it wasn't alive?