Abortion

vantexan

Well-Known Member
It is one choice among several. But the option to terminate a pregnancy through lawful means is THE LAW. Deal with it.
I defer to a higher power in matters of conscience. And you belittled someone who's choice is to not kill babies. Sounds like you only believe in the one option.
 

bacha29

Well-Known Member
No one should be doing that, in the name of Christianity especially. But what's always phenomenal to me is pointing to the relatively few deaths caused by fanatics as justification for killing tens of millions of babies. Neither should be happening.
So gunning down unarmed medical practitioners in cold blood is your idea of Christianity huh? Some Christian you are. And notice how much it did to stop the practice? Then again we shouldn't be surprised given that Christianity has historically been a violent form of religion.
 
F

Frankie's Friend

Guest
What stands between me and whatever moral judgement's I may have regarding the matter is THE LAW. And if standing with the law in the face of the jag offs who in the name of "Christianity" are out there terrorizing women, shooting doctors and blowing up clinics makes me labeled a "baby killer' ...so be it.
You are so full of foolish rebuttals your posts are just page filler and a comma in reality.

You claim that you know me. Childish.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
So gunning down unarmed medical practitioners in cold blood is your idea of Christianity huh? Some Christian you are. And notice how much it did to stop the practice? Then again we shouldn't be surprised given that Christianity has historically been a violent form of religion.
Apparently you have comprehension issues. Where in my post did you see that I approve of such?
 

bacha29

Well-Known Member
Apparently you have comprehension issues. Where in my post did you see that I approve of such?
Go back and read your quote. "relatively few deaths" One was too many yet those three simple words is a thinly veiled attempt to find some twisted justification for cold blooded assassinations carried out by people who decided to take the law into their own hands.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
Go back and read your quote. "relatively few deaths" One was too many yet those three simple words is a thinly veiled attempt to find some twisted justification for cold blooded assassinations carried out by people who decided to take the law into their own hands.
Oh BS. The point is liberals point to the few deaths that happen because of fanatics while ignoring the millions killed by abortion. In no way do I approve of attacking abortionists and I said so. Twist words much?
 

Old Man Jingles

Rat out of a cage
Go back and read your quote. "relatively few deaths" One was too many yet those three simple words is a thinly veiled attempt to find some twisted justification for cold blooded assassinations carried out by people who decided to take the law into their own hands.
images
 

bacha29

Well-Known Member
Oh BS. The point is liberals point to the few deaths that happen because of fanatics while ignoring the millions killed by abortion. In no way do I approve of attacking abortionists and I said so. Twist words much?
Oh, so conservatives don't get abortions huh? The right to consider and or choose an abortion is now finished law. It has been law for nearly half a century. DOJ has stopped petitioning SCOTUS to take up Roe vs. Wade. It's law . Time to move on.
 

BrownArmy

Well-Known Member
Gosh I wish you all would STFU.

As far as I can tell, there are a bunch of men having intense discussions here about what women should be able to do with their bodies.

The Irony.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
Oh, so conservatives don't get abortions huh? The right to consider and or choose an abortion is now finished law. It has been law for nearly half a century. DOJ has stopped petitioning SCOTUS to take up Roe vs. Wade. It's law . Time to move on.
Didn't say they didn't. But abortion advocates scream ab
And?

Who are you to impose your ideas about what women should do with their bodies?

There’s no equivalent.

Maybe, if women ran the world, their idea would be that you should get a watermelon up your butt annually.

Ridiculous, right?
I'm not imposing anything. I'm stating my belief as to what is right, what is wrong, which under the Constitution I'm fully entitled to do. You are allowed to do the same in case you're unaware. As to your suggestion concerning watermelons what does that have to do with reproduction? Is a separate human life involved? Does the sanctity of human life warrant such a flippant response? There are many millions of women in the U.S. who also believe as I do so this isn't a matter of men forcing women to do anything. It's about reminding men and women that sexual gratification without personal responsibility leads to grave consequences. Should be treated much more seriously than it obviously is judging by the abortion numbers.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
Oh, so conservatives don't get abortions huh? The right to consider and or choose an abortion is now finished law. It has been law for nearly half a century. DOJ has stopped petitioning SCOTUS to take up Roe vs. Wade. It's law . Time to move on.
Slavery was legal for centuries but eventually was done away with because of the immorality of owning other humans.
 
Top