This thread is like ground hog day . We've already argued what we believe was the merits of this case last year. Most of the posts here repeat the argument from then.
some of my own rambling thoughts on this case.
Jury did their job. I respect and support their decision. Defense did a terrible job if they couldnt get one sympathetic juror to hang it up in Georgia of all places.
i watched the shooter take the stand , I thought he did a terrible job and probably helped cook his own case.
Shooter sounded like a busy body thats constantly looking to get into someones business. you call the cops and then at most keep a visual of the suspect until the cops show up. Confronting him and trying to detain him was stupid.
daddy sounds like he was the instigator. I could mentally picture him saying lets get that N >>!!
not sure what the third guy did wrong ? Maybe help block in arbry when he was trying to escape. He was the only one I thought would and should have gotten off or only found guilty on a lesser charge.
was it one charge of malicious murder and 5 charges of felony murder for each person? That seems like an overkill. Looks political as hell.
one charge of either /or malicious or felony murder should have been it. Looks like Georgia piggy backs a murder charge for every assault /imprisonment /jay walking charge.
you cant kill one man six times. there should be an appeals for that one.