Amy Coney Barrett

The big package

Well-Known Member
Senate GOP represents 15 mil fewer Americans than Senate Dems. Senate Dems got 18 million more votes than Rs in 2018.
Stop your whining will you .The only reason that would even be the case is because New York and California And are the two biggest states in the country , but they do not make up the whole country they just represent the losers !!!
 

fishtm2001

Well-Known Member
Let's talk about hypocritical , Democrats are supposed to all be about advancement of women , pro women , well the nominee is a woman . And they're all about helping the average person except Biden wants to take away everybody's tax cuts . And they're supposed to be all about helping the minorities but they want to take away school choice which would help the educate these kids , look in the mirror my man , look in the mirror !!!
"..well the nominee is a woman . "

Actually she's a handmaid.
 

The big package

Well-Known Member
"Do we believe in justice that advances individual rights? If so, why is religion a shield, and consumerist legislation not? Why is legislation that enables government to decide what constitutes marriage OK, and individual rights to health treatments not OK? Why are Americans to be afforded the right to assault weapons but not clean air?"

Terry Schwadron, RawStory
Well health treatments are available to everybody in this country .You can buy a health care plan anytime you want , You just called your insurance company also a lot of people just go to the emergency room because they have to take you in an emergency room . As far as clean air , you should talk to your politicians and your celebrities who are currently flying all around the world and then complaining about climate change .The second amendment says You have the right to protect yourself and your family !!!!
 

The big package

Well-Known Member
Are you under the impression that the Trump Administration created the Electoral College?
That would be impossible , Joe Biden went to electoral college !!! Oh no wait he went to Delaware State college , whoops that's wrong too because they said he didn't go there , what a liar!!!!
 

The big package

Well-Known Member
"..well the nominee is a woman . "

Actually she's a handmaid.
o_O WELL , I am just looking forward to the Democrats especially the ones in the Senate that try to squash her religion because as they do that the tens of millions of Catholics will not take kindly to it and that will lead Trump to another victory !!!
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
So who is Amy Coney Barrett? Take a good look , a real good look, and what you'll find is a female Brett Kavanaugh . Another preppy born to a white privileged well to do family who gets to go to an expensive, strictly private college and then on to Notre Dame on a full ride. How many ordinary young American women get to do that?

the kennedys
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
Scalia died 9 months before the election. Republicans said that is too close to having a new president. The new president should get the pick.
4 years later & and same situation except it is 6 weeks before the election. Republicans set the precedent last time. Now they are trying to say it is different. You could have the same picture above with the righties if you switched the years.

ancient whine. new material please

republicans said that precedent has to go back to 1888 the last time a nominee was confirmed in an election year where the president and senate were on different parties.
 

Box Ox

Well-Known Member
Abortion is the law of the land! Will never be reversed, especially by a woman.


ACB is about to roll up behind you in an American tank, Bob.

2B4F7CFD-7959-476D-A9D0-6B3021CE35BE.jpeg
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
The more diverse this nation continues to become the harder it will be to govern using outdated policies while trying to turn the nation into a police state will contribute as much as any other factor to the breakup of the union.

And America in the 21st century having to choose between a pair of disco era presidential candidates will not help it in it's efforts to find it's place in the change world order.

blame the resistance and fake russian investigation and fake protests for all your issues.
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
"Do we believe in justice that advances individual rights? If so, why is religion a shield, and consumerist legislation not? Why is legislation that enables government to decide what constitutes marriage OK, and individual rights to health treatments not OK? Why are Americans to be afforded the right to assault weapons but not clean air?"

Terry Schwadron, RawStory

in god we trust
 

Ghost in the Darkness

Well-Known Member
Liberal presidents have always been so bent on winning over the welfare crowd with "free money" that they get confused and appoint justices to scotus that can't read. It has caused many problems and confusion... nice to see under the Trump admin we are getting smart people to fill scotus vacancies who can read and actually want to preserve the Constitution.
 

DriverNerd

Well-Known Member
I'm not sure what I feel about this woman. I am not a conservative, but she says she will vote according to the constitution - which would be great. Both Kavanaugh and Gorsuch have surprised me on their votes in the past. They don't care about liberal vs conservative and just vote on what is written. I always like RBG for her ability to stand up and protect women's rights, but at the same time many of her opinions came across as how she feels about an issue and not how it is written as law. More so in the past 10 years.

I still think the only reason the Republicans didn't want to vote on a Supreme Court justice in 2016 is they didn't want to have to 'No' to confirm someone who was very qualified and liked by both sides. Then they'd be questioned why they didn't confirm someone who was obviously a good choice, hurting their reputations. It's still hypocritical for the Republicans to do this now, but they obviously don't care. The Republicans would have all voted no on Garland right before the election, just as all the Democrats will vote no for Barrett without this "no voting this close to an election year" BS. But just turning down a potential justice just because he/she was chosen by a President that is a different party is stupid. You need to vote based on their answers to their questions. And no attacking like they did with Kavanaugh - ask adult questions and actually listen to the answers.
 
Top