She did it, then accused her father of Molesting her......someone needs to end her SOON
OJ is still walking the earth, and playing golf - back then I didn't give him much time, either.
I don't think O.J. is allowed to play golf in prison....he's in for 9-33 years!! What rock have you been under?????OJ is still walking the earth, and playing golf - back then I didn't give him much time, either.
Maybe he is just under a canadian mist.I don't think O.J. is allowed to play golf in prison....he's in for 9-33 years!! What rock have you been under?????
http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2008/dec/04/oj-simpsons-lawyer-request-minimum-sentence/
he is under the klein rock... he is cluelessI don't think O.J. is allowed to play golf in prison....he's in for 9-33 years!! What rock have you been under?????
http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2008/dec/04/oj-simpsons-lawyer-request-minimum-sentence/
Well, then don't complain here, maybe she'll be in trouble with the law in roughly 20 years from now, to go to jail for some other crime.
I'm sure you can give her atleast some time, right ?
Well, then don't complain here, maybe she'll be in trouble with the law in roughly 20 years from now, to go to jail for some other crime.
I'm sure you can give her atleast some time, right ?
ORLANDO, Fla. (AP) — Prosecutors proved Casey Anthony was a liar, but convinced the jury of little else.
The government failed to establish how 2-year-old Caylee Anthony died and they couldn't find her mother's DNA on the duct tape they said was used to suffocate her. There was conflicting testimony on whether the putrid smell inside the family's car was a decomposing body or simply trash, and it was never quite clear why chloroform was so important.
The lack of evidence and the doubt raised by the defense — that Caylee accidentally drowned in the family's pool — was enough to win an acquittal.
OJ is still walking the earth, and playing golf - back then I didn't give him much time, either.
Lack of Evidence or Good Defense
I believe it's the former and not the latter. If anything Baez was able to exploit that lack of evidence to the advantage of his case.
A child is dead, no argument and as I said in an earlier post, there are no winners in this case and that is still true. But if anyone is at fault for this, if you will, I'd blame the prosecution and the hysterical, emotion driven public. The public allowed itself to be driven by the likes of the Nancy Graces of the world who saw this as dollar signs in bank accounts. The prosecution instead of doing real due diligence like it should relied on shoddy legal work not unlike a lot of it's other legal work and hoping the pure emotion of the case would carry the day. If there was no real evidence to convict then the jury did it's job and I'm thankful to them for doing it.
Instead of getting all wrapped up emotionally in this whole deal, maybe the prosecution and investigators may have been better served to have laid back, waited and watched. Let the killer think they've got away with it and then they might have relaxed and did or said something they should not which would expose them. It's a high probability the killer of this child is not some abstract stranger but someone close and therefore is not a threat to larger society in a serial kind of way.
The mom may have in fact done this, there is just no evidence to prove it and should that evidence emerge later, because the prosecution and the public's emotional need for blood, the rush to judgement will prohibit a 2nd trial. Then again, the emotional public champions all other trampling of individual rights so I guess double jeopardy could be at peril too.