moreluck
golden ticket member
This is a dumb appointment....
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...-critic-immigration-enforcement-key-role-ice/
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...-critic-immigration-enforcement-key-role-ice/
Moreluck, it's called stackin the deck.This is a dumb appointment....
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...-critic-immigration-enforcement-key-role-ice/
Moreluck, it's called stackin the deck.
Smart for who? For Obama or the country?In which case it's a smart appointment.
\ Never said I was looking up any laws for you.But go ahead, Cowboy. I'm still waiting for those laws you were going to look up. And I'm also still waiting for that federal law that mirrors SB1070, in other words that is identical to SB1070.
I got a big laugh about it.. so should you KOB ! LOL
Basically I do not agree with anything you said so just because I did not take the time to reply to the other gibberish does not mean that I agree with you. Listen AV 8.0, if you say that what I write is gibberish, you should take the time to say why and what’s gibberish what I write, and point it out. You can’t just say it’s gibberish. Here I agree that the individual states cannot pass a law, or they can and it will just be struck down by the courts, if it violates the Constitution. Good. I’m glad one more person has understand that polls don’t say too much in these cases. I think the problem you will end up having is that nothing in the law will interfere with constitutional rights. I think the best shot your side will have will be that this is traditionally the Federal governments responsibility except that they have ceded some of this authority already to the states. I know you do not want to believe it but it is against Federal law to enter this country without permission and now you will be breaking a state law as well. Federal officials can check the status of anyone they reasonably believe is in this country illegally and now under this state law so can local law enforcement officials. That’s our whole point. But, I’ve been debating on the way they’ll do. An immigration official is not the same as a Police Officer. You’re opening too many doors that’ll be hard to close, but I don’t think they’ll get to be opened. This is what people mean when they say the state law mirrors federal law. Then, it doesn’t mirror Federal Law. SB1070 doesn’t reproduce Federal law accurately, and that’s what I mean. No matter what you will chose to not believe this and honestly I do not care. No need to reply to me again I was just trying to help you out. If you want to help me out, look for something at least similar to Sec. 6. Section 13-3883. from HB2162. #5 in particular in a current Federal Law. I’m still looking for it. And if you don’t have the time to reply to that, then take the time to read SB1070.
Never said I was looking up any laws for you. Mirroring of a law doesn't mean it is identical, (as Av8 said) the fact that one is a state law and the other a federal law will keep them from being identical. Then what the heck do you mean by saying that SB1070 mirrors Federal Law, that it has sections written the same as Federal Laws? LOL. So you think SB1070 reproduces Federal Law accurately. LOL. That’s a good joke. So if Texas passes a law in which it copies the whole Constitution and adds a section that says: “A peace officer, without a warrant, may arrest a person if he has probable cause to believe the person has different political views than his. Do you think that law would reproduce our Constitution accurately, Cowboy? LOL. I bet you will.
You keep jumping back and forth with nonsensical rants about all sorts. Why don't you just start over, give the text along with the "chapter, book and verse" that you object to and why you object? If there is a particular section you feel is unconstitutional, explain why you think so. That will give us a common ground for discussion. Other than that it's just back and forth gibberish. I’ve already told you. Why don’t you go back to the posts and answer where I have cited SB1070 and my opinions. The one who’s jumping back and forth with nonsensical rants, it’s you, Texan. In this specified discussion, you and others are saying that SB1070 mirrors Federal Law. I’m telling you how it doesn’t. If you want to finally discuss about SB1070, go back a few pages. I’ve already pointed out the law several times, but you can’t give any argument for that, I guess.
Yea see this what I mean when I say gibberish, where the heck did this rant come from? This is just another attempt on your part to twist what the law says and what it does not say.
If I am indeed jumping back and forth, it's only to try and answer your ....hmmmmm....questions, my train of thought has been stright forward from the start. With what? With a sentence like this: Discrimination against illegals from Mexico is not racism.” –The Cowboy. I made you understand the absurdity of the sentence above. If you couldn’t understand the absurdity of such a sentence, how do you think you’re gonna’ understand such a vague and ambiguous law?Your obvious attempts to get me to loose my temper are useless, not gonna happen.
So, Cowboy, do you think that in that example, would that law mirror the Constitution? I bet you will. LOL. I don’t know why you keep ignoring and ignoring this: If you want to finally discuss about SB1070, go back a few pages. I’ve already pointed out the law several times, but you can’t give any argument for that, I guess.
This is the reason we have this problem, among many many others. We elect idiots! What a uneducated moose, cheesehead!
I never knew Arizona did not border Mexico, did you. Put her out of her misery!
[video=youtube;Ggy__koIkJs]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ggy__koIkJs[/video]
http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/06/26/california.drugs.seized/index.html?hpt=T2
Authorities seize $45 million of narcotics in California drug bust
CNN) -- Authorities in southern California said the strong smell of marijuana helped them discover $45 million worth of drugs in the back of a tractor-trailer they had pulled over for a traffic violation. Deputies stopped the truck Wednesday morning, then opened the trailer after finding problems with the paperwork for the load, the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Office said Friday.
An "overwhelming odor" led investigators to about 20 tons of narcotics stashed in pallets in the back of the truck, including about 38,000 pounds of marijuana, 2,700 pounds of cocaine and 67 pounds of methamphetamine.