Arizona's anti-imigration law...

[Babagounj]

Hey, what does this have to do about what SB1070 says? Or what does it even have to do with the 12 to 15 million illegal immigrants? .

answer this.....just who carries all these illegal drugs from Mexico into the USA ? I case you need help, .....http://www.borderinvasionpics.com/special/dh4DummiesPt1.html

 

[KingofBrown]

Um.... 12 to 15 millions illegal immigrants...? LOL

answer this.....just who carries all these illegal drugs from Mexico into the USA ? I case you need help, .....http://www.borderinvasionpics.com/special/dh4DummiesPt1.html

 

[KingofBrown]

Sorry, I forgot you have Communist ideas. May be you think 12 to 15 million illegal immigrants are drug smugglers... Your Communist ideas treat them all the same, don't they? And you also think that all drug smugglers are illegal immigrants? LOL. I guess you need help.

answer this.....just who carries all these illegal drugs from Mexico into the USA ? I case you need help, .....http://www.borderinvasionpics.com/special/dh4DummiesPt1.html

 

[moreluck]

Sorry, I forgot you have Communist ideas. May be you think 12 to 15 million illegal immigrants are drug smugglers... Your Communist ideas treat them all the same, don't they? And you also think that all drug smugglers are illegal immigrants? LOL. I guess you need help.

The 12-15 million illegals ARE ALL CRIMINALS just because they are here !!! Why can't you get that through your head?

 

[KingofBrown]

Many American drivers have traffic violations. So many drivers are criminals. What does that have to do with drug smuggling? In judging for traffic violations, nothing I guess. Now, 12-15 million people have violated Federal Immigration laws. So 12-15 million people are criminals. What does that have to with drug smuggling? For judging violations of immigration laws, nothing I guess.

The 12-15 million illegals ARE ALL CRIMINALS just because they are here !!! Why can't you get that through your head?

 

[Babagounj]

Many American drivers have traffic violations.
And many more don't.
So many drivers are criminals.No, some are just lousy drivers, maybe you too.
What does that have to do with drug smuggling? Enlighten us to why this is a bother to you.
In judging for traffic violations, nothing I guess.
Now, 12-15 million people have violated Federal Immigration laws.Could be a high as 20 million.
So 12-15 million people are criminals.So you finally get it.
What does that have to with drug smuggling?Who do you think controls the Mexican side of the border. We know from reports that it is NOT the Mexican Government.
It's the drug cartels, who force border jumpers to carry their bundles north.
For judging violations of immigration laws, nothing I guess Don't guess get educated.

 

[KingofBrown]

Hey Stalin, so you're telling me that 12-15 or maybe about 20 million illegal immigrants control the illegal drugs in the US? LOL.

Many American drivers have traffic violations.
And many more don't. But, many do.
So many drivers are criminals.No, some are just lousy drivers, maybe you too. So, driving under the influence of alcohol is not a crime to you. You're the one who needs to get educated, dude.
What does that have to do with drug smuggling? Enlighten us to why this is a bother to you.
In judging for traffic violations, nothing I guess.
Now, 12-15 million people have violated Federal Immigration laws.Could be a high as 20 million.
So 12-15 million people are criminals.So you finally get it. Where have I said crossing illegally is not a crime?
What does that have to with drug smuggling?Who do you think controls the Mexican side of the border. We know from reports that it is NOT the Mexican Government.
It's the drug cartels, who force border jumpers to carry their bundles north.
For judging violations of immigration laws, nothing I guess Don't guess get educated.

See? That's the problem with having Communist ideas. You can't judge people for a crime they have not commited. By your logic you want to judge 20 million illegal immigrants by drug smuggling. My goodness.

 

[Babagounj]

(1) I am not a communist. Never have stated that I was. Those are your words.
(2) Using large and bold typed words is annoying and vulgar.
(3) In order to have a civil conversation one needs to be considerate of others.
(4) Your notion as to compare bad drivers with illegal border jumpers makes no sense.
(5) And where is this " driving under ...not a crime "coming from ?
(6) I ain't your dude.
(7) There is a strong connection between the flow of persons and drugs coming from Mexico.

 

[Babagounj]

(8) You have not questioned the facts that many of these border jumpers are medically unfit to be mixing in our population.

 

[trplnkl]

Hey, Cowboy, what does this have to do about what SB1070 says? Or what does it even have to do with the 12 to 15 million illegal immigrants? I bet you just like reading the subliminal propaganda, and that's why you don't say nothing about it. LOL.

Why are you asking me about this? I didn't post it.

 

[trplnkl]

Sorry KOB, you're losing it.
I understand the law in all of it's perceived vagueness. I guess one would need to have a brain to understand sb1070, again, sorry for your loss. When I made the comment about discrimination I was not talking about the sb1070 per-say , but about racism and nationality. I also said that discrimination was wrong. You can keep dragging up that misstatement all you want, doesn't make you understand the law and certainly adds no credibility to your argument.
As far as your ridiculous twisting of a paragraph from sb1070 and an apples/orange comparison, I see no point in answering your asinine question. Now if you have a sensible honest question, restate it and I will try to explain my view point.

 

[trplnkl]

LOL. I bet she would sign SB1070, too. But, she's not that sexy as governor Brewer, so I wouldn't excuse her for such a thing.

I'll take that bet, how much do you want put down? Not only do you have trouble with reading comprehension, you seem to struggle with the spoken word as well. The woman in the video is a Democratic supervisor (an elected position), she doesn't think Arizona and Mexico share an international boarder, yet she opposes SB1070.
A person's sexuality has nothing to do with this.

 

[moreluck]

KOB.. I dropped a friend I've had since 1975 because she carried a chip on her shoulder just like you do. I got tired of filtering my e-mails and jokes on the chance that it might offend her.

My e-mails are free flowing now that I've dropped her from my address list.

There are several people on this site who can attest that the stuff I send out is not horribly blue or racist.

 

[tieguy]

KOB.. I dropped a friend I've had since 1975 because she carried a chip on her shoulder just like you do. I got tired of filtering my e-mails and jokes on the chance that it might offend her.

My e-mails are free flowing now that I've dropped her from my address list.

There are several people on this site who can attest that the stuff I send out is not horribly blue or racist.

the liberal when confronted with real world logic will often curl up in the fetal position and cry racist as a defense mechanism.

 

[toonertoo]

KOB.. I dropped a friend I've had since 1975 because she carried a chip on her shoulder just like you do. I got tired of filtering my e-mails and jokes on the chance that it might offend her.

My e-mails are free flowing now that I've dropped her from my address list.

There are several people on this site who can attest that the stuff I send out is not horribly blue or racist.

I attest to that. Its stuff for unwinding and getting a laugh. And I appreciate it. Even if I do not get to look at it all.

 

[toonertoo]

I'll take that bet, how much do you want put down? Not only do you have trouble with reading comprehension, you seem to struggle with the spoken word as well. The woman in the video is a Democratic supervisor (an elected position), she doesn't think Arizona and Mexico share an international boarder, yet she opposes SB1070.
A person's sexuality has nothing to do with this.

Yes it was me, I just thought it was one of those light hearted moments, when we can see why we are where we are. People spouting off about what Arizona is doing, in fact what the government federal should have been doing, including during the Bush terms, and the clinton Terms. And not having a clue where Arizona is. I think it is sad,
But I also thought 57 states was sad, and he is our president. Now that is real real sad.
Here is the segment explained.
[video=youtube;klGQ_Z7tedU]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=klGQ_Z7tedU&feature=related[/video]

 

[KingofBrown]

(1) I am not a communist. Never have stated that I was. Those are your words. Well, comparing North Korea to the USA is an insult for me. If someone wants to adopt Communist ideas, that’s a Communist to me.
(2) Using large and bold typed words is annoying and vulgar. Haven’t read that web rule before. I’ll keep it in mind.
(3) In order to have a civil conversation one needs to be considerate of others. 100% agreed. When I started discussing about this thread I had that in mind. I don’t know if you guys do.
(4) Your notion as to compare bad drivers with illegal border jumpers makes no sense. As well as your and your buddies’ notion to compare drug smugglers with illegal immigrants.
(5) And where is this " driving under ...not a crime "coming from ? Make a further reading.
(6) I ain't your dude. Thanks GOD.
(7) There is a strong connection between the flow of persons and drugs coming from Mexico. There is, indeed. But, that doesn’t make 20 million illegal immigrants into felons. And do you think SB1070 would resolve this? No, instead it’ll drain out the resources to fight the drug problem if it goes in effect on July 29.
8) You have not questioned the facts that many of these border jumpers are medically unfit to be mixing in our population. Why don’t you put that on the table, and make a further explanation?

 

[KingofBrown]

Sorry KOB, you're losing it.
I understand the law in all of it's perceived vagueness. I guess one would need to have a brain to understand sb1070, again, sorry for your loss. When I made the comment about discrimination I was not talking about the sb1070 per-say , but about racism and nationality. I also said that discrimination was wrong. You can keep dragging up that misstatement all you want, doesn't make you understand the law and certainly adds no credibility to your argument.
As far as your ridiculous twisting of a paragraph from sb1070 and an apples/orange comparison, I see no point in answering your asinine question. Now if you have a sensible honest question, restate it and I will try to explain my view point.

Please explain how am I twisting it? You have to support your statements. I also believe you ridiculously twist the meaning of the law a lot, so doesn’t that make SB0170 such a vague and ambiguous law? If it’s that easy to twist as you claim, you just supported my statement that the law is vague and ambiguous. Don’t be afraid, analyzing the law won’t harm you. And believe me, your credibility for discussing this law hit the ground when you made such a ridiculous and absurd statement such as: “Discrimination against illegals from Mexico is not racism.”-The Cowboy. So you can just keep ignoring my persistence for you to go back a few pages and finally discuss the law where I have cited it.

 

[KingofBrown]

I'll take that bet, how much do you want put down? Not only do you have trouble with reading comprehension, you seem to struggle with the spoken word as well. The woman in the video is a Democratic supervisor (an elected position), she doesn't think Arizona and Mexico share an international boarder, yet she opposes SB1070.
A person's sexuality has nothing to do with this.

Hey, Cowboy, calm down, it’s clear you couldn’t get the joke, you need to look down for the word “Sarcasm” in a dictionary. If she doesn't think Arizona and Mexico share a border is because she's not that brilliant, so that's why I said she would sign SB1070, too. But, as I see you still wanna' bet. LOL.

 

[KingofBrown]

Really? You have lost a friend for such an absurd and vague law? Wow. Did she say that what you sent was racist? I don’t get it.
So if a person who puts arguments or topics on the discussion to make an analysis and you don’t agree with those, does that make a person having a chip on his/her shoulder? I don’t think so; that makes the other person, who can’t discuss those, to have a chip on his/her shoulder. You better get back to that friend of yours. Laws and different points of view come back and forth, but a friend it’s hard to find. That’s my simple opinion.

KOB.. I dropped a friend I've had since 1975 because she carried a chip on her shoulder just like you do. I got tired of filtering my e-mails and jokes on the chance that it might offend her.

My e-mails are free flowing now that I've dropped her from my address list.

There are several people on this site who can attest that the stuff I send out is not horribly blue or racist.