Wow! NF responses in the wrong thread. Not surprising.
2D*s back to back.
2D*s back to back.
A Fluffer started this thread. What do you expect?Wow! NF responses in the wrong thread. Not surprising.
2D*s back to back.
No it would mean in the flex position you could play wr rb or TE.Wow! NF responses in the wrong thread. Not surprising.
2D*s back to back.
Could of said beaver
All it would mean that you could play 2 TE's, instead of 1.Just to be clear should the "flex" TE position be approved it would allow us to use a TE or WR in the TE position right?
Also the reason for my change in this ruling is because whether you have a good TE or not it does give you more flexibility.
For instance... if I have an awesome TE I can use him often and if he were to get injured or on a bye week it gives me some flexibility. Same thing if my TE sucks... I can use a WR or see if down the road I can acquire a better TE on waivers.
Am I missing something?
Can we add the second TE after week 4. LolAll it would mean that you could play 2 TE's, instead of 1.
Nope, either before thursday, or not this yearCan we add the second TE after week 4. Lol
He is gonna get kicked.What about adding a kicker to flex. Turd has three kickers on his roster?
I do need another TE.Waivers will be processed tomorrow morning. Get those claims in today.
Only for you, if you leave a position blank, that highest scoring player on another's team fills that position.Can we start a player on our team that is on another person's team ,if that person is not using them that week?
Waivers will be processed tomorrow morning. Get those claims in today.
Can we start a player on our team that is on another person's team ,if that person is not using them that week?
I do need another TE.
NoCan we start a player on our team that is on another person's team ,if that person is not using them that week?