Best Run States Are Republican Controlled

[realbrown1]

You'll "try us why "? How much murica have you had to drink tonight?

Red X, what's up?

 

[rickyb]

The "PROBLEM" is that people like you dont understand what fiscal responsibility means.

If you CUT taxes, you REDUCE revenue. NEVER in history, has cutting taxes of the rich INCREASED revenue in the economy. Republicans always run on a platform of cutting taxes and increasing revenue by stimulating the economy with trickle down economics.

Unfortunately, its NEVER worked.

In Kansas, the governor cut taxes and wiped out not only his economy, but his infrastructure as well. He has to borrow from highway funds just to keep the government running and he also has to DIVERT billions out of state pensions to pay for HIS SHORTFALLS.

Thats pension money that will never be recovered, much like Reagan did to social security.

Its amazing how people like you "THINK" you know how things work.

TOS.

actually if hte government cut taxes on poor people who spend everything they earn, then it would probably be a stimulus.

diverting billions out of state pensions? sounds like they wont be paid

 

[realbrown1]

If only there was a political party in this country that actually believed what you're selling.

There is now.

And Trump is leading that party.

 

[rickyb]

You liberals are simply retarded. Here we have a thread about a study that simply shows that Republican run states are more fiscally sound and you pecker heads are tossing "climate change" into the discussion?!?! LOL.

Why don't you people just realize that being liberal with money is a bad thing? I'll try you why. You can't because your emotions get in the way of any chance at using logic and common sense.

climate change will cost trillions.

 

[rickyb]

yea and yet as undesirable as we try to make ourselves we still have millions sneaking across the border to join us.

"The loss of faith in the political system and neoliberal ideology is widespread. The corporate elites are pouring $5 billion into the carnival of presidential electoral politics in a desperate bid to keep us mesmerized and controlled. Democracy is endlessly invoked on the airwaves to legitimize the corporate and political forces that have destroyed it. Congress has an approval rating of 11 percent. Half of qualified voters are not registered to vote, and half of registered voters do not go to the polls. A little more than half of 25 percent—no more than 15 percent—of the electorate determines who becomes president. And this is the way the elites want it."

 

[The Other Side]

Cutting taxes works when done in conjunction with cutting spending and phasing out bloated government programs that aren't needed. But you people think that we "need" big government and are too stupid to realize that there aren't enough rich people (or workers for that matter) to fund all of your gravy train handouts and unproductive government jobs.

You people are like a disease that some sick and twisted mad scientist from a foreign government designed to infect this country and destroy it from within. And that very well could be the case. Circa the Soviets/Rusians and/or Chinese.

Demonstrate ONE period of time where cutting the taxes of the rich has EVER worked in the history of the USA.

And please, save yourself the embarrassment and dont name Reagan. You would only be lining up a homerun for me.

You are talking about a THEORY, not a practical working method.

Everyone knows, that if you could control spending, then you could cut REVENUE, but that never happens.

Didnt happen for Hoover, Didnt happen for Reagan, Didnt happen for BUSH2 and it isnt happening for ALL the republican governors in the USA.

The best that the republicans can do , is kick the can down the road until they leave office, so they wont end up holding the bag...

IE: GEORGE W. BUSH who left nearly 6 trillion dollars on the desk of president Obama on the day he left. That debt spread over the next 10 years from when Obama took office.

TO YOU, thats fiscal responsibility.

TOS.

 

[The Other Side]

actually if hte government cut taxes on poor people who spend everything they earn, then it would probably be a stimulus.

diverting billions out of state pensions? sounds like they wont be paid

Of course they wont be paid, and the middle class redneck in Kansas will never see their earned pensions, as the RICH got the tax breaks and "They" end up paying for them.

But of course, O.U.T. would have you believe thats the way to run a state properly.

Backwoods math.

TOS.

 

[Overpaid Union Thug]

Demonstrate ONE period of time where cutting the taxes of the rich has EVER worked in the history of the USA.

And please, save yourself the embarrassment and dont name Reagan. You would only be lining up a homerun for me.

You are talking about a THEORY, not a practical working method.

Everyone knows, that if you could control spending, then you could cut REVENUE, but that never happens.

Didnt happen for Hoover, Didnt happen for Reagan, Didnt happen for BUSH2 and it isnt happening for ALL the republican governors in the USA.

The best that the republicans can do , is kick the can down the road until they leave office, so they wont end up holding the bag...

IE: GEORGE W. BUSH who left nearly 6 trillion dollars on the desk of president Obama on the day he left. That debt spread over the next 10 years from when Obama took office.

TO YOU, thats fiscal responsibility.

TOS.

Three times revenue increased after tax cuts

But again....... If you liberals didn't spend waaaaaaay beyond your means on handouts and unproductive government jobs taxes wouldn't be an issue.

Just face it dude. Your people suck at running things. Particularly spending.

 

[Overpaid Union Thug]

climate change will cost trillions.

Yes it will...... If liberals are doing the spending.

 

[Overpaid Union Thug]

If only there was a political party in this country that actually believed what you're selling.

There are several. You don't belong to any of them because you are a liberal.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

There are several. You don't belong to any of them because you are a liberal.

You're a liberal.

 

[Overpaid Union Thug]

You're a liberal.

I can't be a liberal because I know how to balance a checkbook. If I was at least I'd admId it. But you...... are ashamed of what you are. You are gutless.

Red X that.......


LIBERAL!

 

[bacha29]

You brown guys have lost sight of one important fact. The right to collective bargaining is and will remain a key component of the so called "liberal" political agenda. What would you have today without it? .........FedEx. How many of you guys would trade what you have at Brown for what they have at Fed Ex?

 

[newfie]

"The loss of faith in the political system and neoliberal ideology is widespread. The corporate elites are pouring $5 billion into the carnival of presidential electoral politics in a desperate bid to keep us mesmerized and controlled. Democracy is endlessly invoked on the airwaves to legitimize the corporate and political forces that have destroyed it. Congress has an approval rating of 11 percent. Half of qualified voters are not registered to vote, and half of registered voters do not go to the polls. A little more than half of 25 percent—no more than 15 percent—of the electorate determines who becomes president. And this is the way the elites want it."

and yet millions of people are risking drowning to cross the rio grande river to come here. go figure

 

[newfie]

Red X, what's up?

you done good bro, they gave you a red x trophy

 

[The Other Side]

Three times revenue increased after tax cuts

But again....... If you liberals didn't spend waaaaaaay beyond your means on handouts and unproductive government jobs taxes wouldn't be an issue.

Just face it dude. Your people suck at running things. Particularly spending.

From your own article..

"Of course, it would be oversimplifying to suggest that tax rates and economic growth are the only determinants of tax revenue. Not every tax cut will increase revenue, nor will every tax increase. Most tax cuts partially pay for themselves with increased revenue from higher economic growth, but not all."

This article LEAVES out all the other metrics of TAX INCREASES over those same years and it tries to limit the argument to economic growth because of the tax cuts.

But like Reagan, He RAISED taxes all over the map to cover his shortfalls, and diverted social security money via tax increases to try to keep his head above water.

What YOU fail to understand is how money is diverted, and the people who would try to convince you that tax cuts are the answer to a growing economy trick you by leaving out the details.

If you want to read something REAL, read this.

Ronald Reagan and The Great Social Security Heist : FedSmith.com

TOS.

 

[The Other Side]

and yet millions of people are risking drowning to cross the rio grande river to come here. go figure

This is the stupidest thing ever said about immigration.

TOS.

 

[realbrown1]

you done good bro, they gave you a red x trophy

It's mostly DIDO.

He gives me 3 to 5 a day.

What a troll.

 

[realbrown1]

This is the stupidest thing ever said about immigration.

TOS.

How can that be the stupidest thing said about immigration WHEN IT'S TRUE.

People from all over the world lie, cheat, steal and risk their life and their family's lives to try and get here.

Millions.

I say deport them all.

 

[realbrown1]

From your own article..

"Of course, it would be oversimplifying to suggest that tax rates and economic growth are the only determinants of tax revenue. Not every tax cut will increase revenue, nor will every tax increase. Most tax cuts partially pay for themselves with increased revenue from higher economic growth, but not all."

This article LEAVES out all the other metrics of TAX INCREASES over those same years and it tries to limit the argument to economic growth because of the tax cuts.

But like Reagan, He RAISED taxes all over the map to cover his shortfalls, and diverted social security money via tax increases to try to keep his head above water.

What YOU fail to understand is how money is diverted, and the people who would try to convince you that tax cuts are the answer to a growing economy trick you by leaving out the details.

If you want to read something REAL, read this.

Ronald Reagan and The Great Social Security Heist : FedSmith.com

TOS.

Liar.

Reagan never RAISED taxes.

Reagan got rid of some tax loop holes that special interest used.

I am all for lowering tax rates and getting rid of tax loop holes.