Thebrownblob
Well-Known Member
Why aren’t you quoting dido supporting gays and abortion and drilling him?
Are you upset I don’t agree with an unarmed woman being shot dead in her home by police serving a no knock warrant?
Why aren’t you quoting dido supporting gays and abortion and drilling him?
Are you upset I don’t agree with an unarmed woman being shot dead in her home by police serving a no knock warrant?
I didn’t at all. I fully acknowledged what he said was right and how ridiculous it is to expect opinions to not change over time.
That’s what you did. Tried to change the subject and throw it back on something that has nothing to do with it..I didn’t at all. I fully acknowledged what he said was right and how ridiculous it is to expect opinions to not change over time.
I then asked why single me out when the guy I’m discussing this with did basically the exact same thing as me.
No I fully accepted his accusation and answered then asked a follow up question to assess his intentions on hopping in the conversation singling me out as someone who is a waffler when the person I’m speaking to has done the same thing.That’s what you did. Tried to change the subject and throw it back on something that has nothing to do with us..
And you don’t even believe unarmed people shouldn’t be shot unless they’re in their house lol.
What a great qualification as long as you’re in your house, you shouldn’t be shot but otherwise if we feel dangerous, even though you’re unarmed we’re just gonna shoot you and it’s OK.
DIDO change of heart makes sense even if I don’t fully agree with what he saying, yours is nonsense. Par for the course for you.
Sorry when you say, “what about Dido?” That’s exactly what it is. The rules apply to you too, my friend even though you don’t think they do..No I fully accepted his accusation and answered then asked a follow up question to assess his intentions on hopping in the conversation singling me out as someone who is a waffler when the person I’m speaking to has done the same thing.
That isn’t whataboutism I fully addressed and accepted his previous point, not just point at others.
No I didn’t hide behind dido, I fully accepted and answered his question.Sorry when you say, “what about Dido?” That’s exactly what it is. The rules apply to you too, my friend even though you don’t think they do..
Read my definition again, genius. You responded to an accusation. Then made a counter accusation. On A different issue. You can live in a fairytale land somewhere else, but not here.No I didn’t hide behind dido, I fully accepted and answered his question.
I then asked a very fair question about why me?
Here since you’re using words you don’t understand try educating yourself instead of further humiliating yourself with these false allegations of whataboutism.
Yea I did read your definition, I didn’t do that. I fully answered his allegation and accepted it. A follow up question that is topic related “changing opinions over time” to assess his intentions of asking me the question is not whataboutism.Read my definition again, genius. You responded to an accusation. Then made a counter accusation. On A different issue. You can live in a fairytale land somewhere else, but not here.
Not only that but your position on cops is pathetic. Apparently you only like them when they shoot unarmed people wherever you feel is appropriate.
We understand you’re just virtue signaling. You don’t have any real beliefs. Well, other than you hate Christians that’s it.
L O L sure buddy!!Yea I did read your definition, I didn’t do that. I fully answered his allegation and accepted it. A follow up question that is topic related “changing opinions over time” to assess his intentions of asking me the question is not whataboutism.
He constantly reverts back to saying the cops didn't knock.Read my definition again, genius. You responded to an accusation. Then made a counter accusation. On A different issue. You can live in a fairytale land somewhere else, but not here.
Not only that but your position on cops is pathetic. Apparently you only like them when they shoot unarmed people wherever you feel is appropriate.
We understand you’re just virtue signaling. You don’t have any real beliefs. Well, other than you hate Christians that’s it.
Truth is, I can agree with him about the idea that I don’t really like like no warrants. It is curious that he picked this particular one which isn’t even even a good example of them going to the wrong house. It’s because he’s virtue signaling of course everyone knows that. He doesn’t give a damn about cops shooting unarmed people.He constantly reverts back to saying the cops didn't knock.
Knocking with a battering ram doesn’t count.He constantly reverts back to saying the cops didn't knock.
You’re using the word wrong I didn’t answer his question with a question, I answer it with acknowledgement and honesty, then asked a follow up question.L O L sure buddy!!
Teacher teacher I know I did this, but somebody else did something too!!!
Well, they knocked first however, short that knock was and then they did ram it down. And they weren’t at the wrong house.Knocking with a battering ram doesn’t count.
But you didn’t answer it because your answer is ridiculous. You made up of lame excuse.You’re using the word wrong I didn’t answer his question with a question, I answer it with acknowledgement and honesty, then asked a follow up question.
I am hardly a fan of no knocks but the point is that doesn't apply here. Blame the drug dealer boyfriend for shooting at the cops. That would make him the one guilty of murder even if he wasn't the one who shot her.Truth is, I can agree with him about the idea that I don’t really like like no warrants. It is curious that he picked this particular one which isn’t even even a good example of them going to the wrong house. It’s because he’s virtue of course everyone knows that. He doesn’t give a damn about cop shooting unarmed people.
How is yes I changed my opinion you’re right a ridiculous answer? That is honest and forth coming.But you didn’t answer it because your answer is ridiculous. You made up of lame excuse.
Personally, I feel they knew where he lived. They could’ve arrested him at any time.. but I understand your point and I do understand that people are sick of drugs and crime. I don’t however feel it’s a great idea to give that much power to police. Just my opinion.I am hardly a fan of no knocks but the point is that doesn't apply here. Blame the drug dealer boyfriend for shooting at the cops. That would make him the one guilty of murder even if he wasn't the one who shot her.
Because you didn’t change your opinion. You like when cops kill unarmed people just the people you don’t like.How is yes I changed my opinion you’re right a ridiculous answer? That is honest and forth coming.
Yes I did.Because you didn’t change your opinion. You like when cops kill unarmed people just the people you don’t like.