Thebrownblob
Well-Known Member
Perhaps
BIDEN GETS INVOLVED IN CERTAIN MASS SHOOTINGS, OTHERS-NOT SO MUCH?
- Thread starter Wally
- Start date
El Correcto
god is dead
Ashley Babbitt was participating in a violent insurrection and actively breaking into a government building. That’s a big difference between being in your home unarmed and gunned down by police.
That is also whataboutism on your part.
Thebrownblob
Well-Known Member
Sure, if you wanna believe that. I only responded to you saying unarmed people shouldn’t be shot and you don’t believe that. You have a bunch of qualifiers, which is ridiculous on its face.
If you’re being honest, you know he had no reason to shoot her. She wasn’t armed he could’ve arrested her. There was plenty of other people doing the same thing she was doing. He was a coward with a gun. Again by your standards, everyone there should’ve been mowed down.
El Correcto
god is dead
He didn’t know she was unarmed, she was actively the aggressor participating in a violent riot and storming the capitol.
Big difference in that and being unarmed in your home being gunned down by police.
Thebrownblob
Well-Known Member
Yeah, that’s not how that works. She was no threat to him. He was a no immediate danger from her. Your and you know this, but you’re going to continue, you got called out for your hypocrisy and now you just keep digging a hole for yourself, by using a lame excuse that now you somehow like cops, shooting unarmed people in some situations, but not others . Conveniently others that are On the other end of the political spectrum from you. This is hilarious. It’s about as transparent as it can be. guess we’re done here.
Thebrownblob
Well-Known Member
What’s the big difference by the way? Actually being in your home you have every right to be armed. You don’t even understand that.
El Correcto
god is dead
You don’t have every right to be armed if you are doing something you shouldn’t be doing like engaging in felony drug dealing in your own home. Law won’t protect your right to be armed while committing felonies.
Your whataboutism is pretty lame comparing a violent rioter breaking and entering a government office to an unarmed woman in here own home being gunned down.
Thebrownblob
Well-Known Member
Really what did she do that was violent?
So then you admit the guy is the one that killed that girl not the police? Was he a felon? I’m not certain he was or wasn’t. If he wasn’t, so basically the whole sham story you made that’s supposedly made you hate police up just blew up on you.
It wasn’t the wrong house
He had no business having a gun
Shot first
And was a criminal.
The police are not responsible for her murder
I guess in this instance @DriveInDriveOut was right.
This is like taking candy from a baby
El Correcto
god is dead
Participating in a violent riot and breaking into a building.Really what did she do that was violent?
So then you admit the guy is the one that killed that girl not the police? Was he a felon? I’m not certain he was or wasn’t. If he wasn’t, so basically the whole sham story you made that’s supposedly made you hate police up just blew up on you.
It wasn’t the wrong house
He had no business having a gun
Shot first
And was a criminal.
The police are not responsible for her murder
I guess in this instance @DriveInDriveOut was right.
This is like taking candy from a baby
If someone popped off shots at me while in a crowded are and I hit an unarmed citizen minding their own business, I’d be held accountable.
You can’t just hit unarmed bystanders who are not threatening your life because a bad guy is.
Yes the police shot an unarmed bystander and are responsible for her death.
Thebrownblob
Well-Known Member
Yawn
Thebrownblob
Well-Known Member
Judge rules Breonna Taylor's boyfriend caused her death, throws out major charges against ex-Louisville officers
The judge also threw out major felony charges against two former Louisville police officers accused of falsifying a warrant.
www.cbsnews.com
El Correcto
god is dead
Tired yourself out with this whataboutism fit?
Sleep well my eepy fren.
Thebrownblob
Well-Known Member
Nope, just tired of your silliness. Obviously the judge didn’t agree with you either. You’re wrong so much must hurt you. Enjoy fantasy Island because I think you’re the only one on that island with yourself.
El Correcto
god is dead
So people not guilty pay 12 million in civil damages to family members of the deceased and bring about political reform around the no knock warrant system?
Weird, but you’re right I must be wrong about my opinion of murdering unarmed women in their homes while serving no knock warrants is insane. Surely no one agrees with me.
Also I never brought up wrong houses or the legal problems with the warrant.
Thebrownblob
Well-Known Member
Oh, so you admit Trump isn’t guilty after all.
And it was never stated that that was your opinion you made a declarative statement, saying the fault.
It’s also weird you don’t have any problem that Brianna certainly knew her boyfriend was a criminal even held money for him. But you. worried about some other lady who deserve to die in your opinion because she was doing something really criminal why not Brianna? It sounds like she made a lot of bad choices.
When opinions are based on virtue signaling and fantasy, it’s very easy to prove your hypocrisy.
And I would have to go back and reread the whole thread because everyone else is saying you’re lying about not saying that was the wrong house. Certainly you’re not trustworthy enough to take your word.
Thebrownblob
Well-Known Member
I do love that I’ve gotten under your skin so much you replied to me hours later. You know you’re full of baloney it bothers you, but you can’t possibly admit it L O L..
You have absolutely no problem with police killing unarmed people as long as it suits your narrative.
El Correcto
god is dead
You took me off your block list and added me to your stalk list apparently. Keep in mind you coming onto me.
Full of truth and honesty.
Nuance to lethal force.
Thebrownblob
Well-Known Member
Occasionally, you say some reasonable things so I thought I’d give you a chance but clearly that was a mistake. L O L.
Doublestandards
Well-Known Member
Something I think both “sides” can agree on is the police should have been wearing body cams. There’s no reason for them not to be, and it only protects the honest people on both sides, whether the cop or the suspect
Witnesses said they didn’t hear police announcing themselves as police, but again, no body cameras so who knows. If they did announce themselves as police, I’m not sure why they all were wearing plainclothes though
my unpopular opinion: this is another example of the failure of the war on drugs. Police were injured, the streets are not any safer and it didn’t stop anybody from using drugs, and it cost tax payers over $10 million dollars
Witnesses said they didn’t hear police announcing themselves as police, but again, no body cameras so who knows. If they did announce themselves as police, I’m not sure why they all were wearing plainclothes though
my unpopular opinion: this is another example of the failure of the war on drugs. Police were injured, the streets are not any safer and it didn’t stop anybody from using drugs, and it cost tax payers over $10 million dollars
El Correcto
god is dead
The truth is intoxicating ain’t it?