That is what got the Repugs in trouble.If Dems are smart, they’ll turn over districting to computers and let demographics do the rest.
538 did a podcast series about it. It’s worth a listen if you’re interested. There are many problems that arise when trying to fix it. The voting rights act causes some problems that basically mandate it. That’s why I think we should turn it over to some algorithms, but as witnessed by the Zuckerberg senate hearings, our officials are basically Luddites.Why is Gerrymandering legal?
Dodging which taxes? I only live whereIt's a weird dynamic going on here for decades. White flight to the burbs to avoid 'crime'.
Truth is they're just dodging taxes, even though they drive into the city to work every day. Eventually the financial requirements of a dense population catches up to them, and their municipality starts raising taxes.
Then they move further out, rinse and repeat. Just a bunch of delusional tax dodgers.
Computer algorithms do what the person that programmed desired and hopefully intended.538 did a podcast series about it. It’s worth a listen if you’re interested. There are many problems that arise when trying to fix it. The voting rights act causes some problems that basically mandate it. That’s why I think we should turn it over to some algorithms, but as witnessed by the Zuckerberg senate hearings, our officials are basically Luddites.
Property.Dodging which taxes? I only live where
I can afford to. With quality of life first priority. Saving .1% has never been a consideration.
Voting laws designed to protect minorities.Why is Gerrymandering legal?
The latest lawsuits set up a pretty decent standard of wasted votes with the efficiency gap metric. You could set an algorithm to limit that and it would probably be a good start to maintain a more representative government. It’s a start and there’d still be problems, but it would limit the blatant disenfranchisement the current system encourages.Computer algorithms do what the person that programmed desired and hopefully intended.
In most cases, computers only do things faster and not as good as a person.
Check out the posts and threads on ORION.
I really don't buy that because slimy politicians will be involved.The latest lawsuits set up a pretty decent standard of wasted votes with the efficiency gap metric. You could set an algorithm to limit that and it would probably be a good start to maintain a more representative government. It’s a start and there’d still be problems, but it would limit the blatant disenfranchisement the current system encourages.
Make the code transparent so data nerds can show when a party is cooking the books in their own favor. It may not matter but it’d be in the open instead of hidden like it is now. Now they use algorithims to suppress votes and consolidate power and it’s all hidden from the public. Open it up, sunshine as a disinfectant yadda yadda.I really don't buy that because slimy politicians will be involved.
Political parties will develop their own inputs to produce a desired output.
Framers intended it to be a legislative issue. Vote them out if they cheat, it doesn’t really work in practice, especially with the data we have available now. That and we haven’t increased the number of members in the house in a long time.I'm not sure we need a computer to figure out voting districts.
I don't get it, when a certain state is Gerrymandered to the point where one party can win even though they have less actual votes, that seems undemocratic to me.
What am I missing?
I like the idea.Make the code transparent so data nerds can show when a party is cooking the books in their own favor. It may not matter but it’d be in the open instead of hidden like it is now. Now they use algorithims to suppress votes and consolidate power and it’s all hidden from the public. Open it up, sunshine as a disinfectant yadda yadda.
I really don't buy that because slimy politicians will be involved.
Political parties will develop their own inputs to produce a desired output.
Like Obama, Like Hillary, Like Trump, Like Kemp, Like all of them.Like Kemp?
Lulz
It's complicated!What's the issue if we just divide districts up by a grid, everyone votes, and we just add up all the votes?
Sorry to sound so dense, I just don't understand the issue.
I understand the part of the issue where 'Gerrymandering' has disenfranchised voters, but it's not clear to me why we're where we are.
It's 2018, if I go to an ATM, I get my cash out, the odds of a mistake are negligible.
It's 2018, why can't voting be like an ATM?
We have the technology, what's the issue?
How hard is it to tabulate votes?
Again, what am I missing?
Like Obama, Like Hillary, Like Trump, Like Kemp, Like all of them.
I have this up on my screen.538 did a podcast series about it.
It' complicated!