Article XII of the IBT Constitution (Ratification of Local Union Collective Bargaining Agreements) says "to use every possible means of achieving a settlement or resolution of the difficulty or dispute through the process of collective bargaining." If they intend to force this sub par supplement on us, it clearly violates that language and will be addressed by filing charges with the NLRB.
They amended the Constitution to allow themselves to force that supplement on us because the issue we had (Teamcare) was not a supplemental issue, it was included in the language of the Master Agreement. The current issues are ALL supplemental so that amendment is null & void in this circumstance.
You say all of that with such conviction.
....and again, I hope I am wrong....but?
~Section 6. The General Executive Board is empowered to amend, delete, or add to this Article if at any time it believes such action will be in the interests of the International Union or its subordinate bodies.~
In 2013-14, the rejected supplements (Local 89 Air Rider, Metro Philly, or Western Pennsylvania) had
ZERO language that attempted to usurp TeamCare or any other part of the National Master, yet they were imposed under the arbitrary assumption that it was in protest to TeamCare.
But then again there are supplements that had and still have language that does usurp TeamCare to this day, or we would all be on it....wouldn't we?
Wanna try again to make that "TeamCare argument" to make sense?
In the end also don't forget:
~The General President shall have authority to interpret the Constitution and laws of the International Union, including the authority to interpret the Bylaws of subordinate bodies, and to decide all questions of law thereunder between meetings of the General Executive Board.~
God I hope I am wrong.