wally posts a pic of LA, its notorious for bad public transitWe're not cattle like Canadians and Big City Americans!
wally posts a pic of LA, its notorious for bad public transitWe're not cattle like Canadians and Big City Americans!
Take a small electric car. Can't have it both ways.us public transit sucks balls. corrupted by auto industry and big oil
still not as efficient as public transit.Take a small electric car. Can't have it both ways.
Can't ride share or move the awards somewhere that has mass transit? These people are preaching one thing and living another?wally posts a pic of LA, its notorious for bad public transit
Californians who can't afford a car deserve to have bad public transportation.wally posts a pic of LA, its notorious for bad public transit
I believe in living large just like these Hollywood phonies.im talking about everything you believe in.
But the FREEDOM is great!still not as efficient as public transit.
capitalism isnt practical
Spent a month in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan last year. It's a fairly prosperous city in the center. A lot of very nice cars on the street. Fellow told me that 20 years before, coming out of Communism, they had absolutely nothing. I met so many people who greatly admired America(and hated Russia).Capitalism is the very reason our countries, Canada and the US have what they have.
It’s easy to scream about the evils of capitalism. There are indeed many. But we wouldn’t live nearly as well as we do in its absence.
I'm for public transit in congested areas. But a car will get you out of the weather and to a specific location quickly. With spread out cities and suburbs there's nothing efficient about getting from point A to B across town unless you have tons of time, nowhere to be. But if you live along a line, bus, subway, or train, that's close to home and to a regular destination it's definitely cheaper than owning a car. Did that in Seattle for a year.still not as efficient as public transit.
Agreed. But the US is not like Europe. Population is far more spread out. Public transit will work in some areas but much too inefficient for most of the country.I'm for public transit in congested areas. But a car will get you out of the weather and to a specific location quickly. With spread out cities and suburbs there's nothing efficient about getting from point A to B across town unless you have tons of time, nowhere to be. But if you live along a line, bus, subway, or train, that's close to home and to a regular destination it's definitely cheaper than owning a car. Did that in Seattle for a year.
Spent a month in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan last year. It's a fairly prosperous city in the center. A lot of very nice cars on the street. Fellow told me that 20 years before, coming out of Communism, they had absolutely nothing. I met so many people who greatly admired America(and hated Russia).
If it’s a brand new jet, it’s probably relatively more fuel efficient. So there’s that.
We already knew they were GOOBERS!
its a 757 about 20 years old , nice try though
They quit making them 15 years agoactually i stand corrected 30 years old , owned by delta
We already knew they were GOOBERS!
They quit making them 15 years ago
But the Dems only turned on Russia after they gave up communism.That's exactly the opposite of the DemWits and Repugs ...
The Repugs__love America and Russia_(Trump for sure).
The DemWits hate America and Russia (LibTurds for sure).